Viewing profile — bedman12345
bedman12345
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Feb 26, 2022, 10:32 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 35
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bedman12345
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49158243
Could you explain what practical research there is to be done? The heavy theory I know does not seem to be very useful in practice. Optimal join algorithms, Yannakakis adjacent alg…
-
comment
Comment #49158171
Which database companies have research labs? AFAIK amazon, snowflake, databricks, google and SAP don’t have a research lab dedicated to databases. They have some people that are pa…
-
comment
Comment #45460473
> And yet terms like "elegant" have no objective definition. Why does that matter? You seem to really think one needs objective definitions? It should be clear that whether a defin…
-
comment
Comment #45455762
> You claim things as being inherently hard to read and understand. I don’t. > But this is a matter of one's personal context and experience. There are things that I'd find hard to…
-
comment
Comment #45454209
True. My statements are meaningful because of that. The objective measures we could agree on are obvious, so they need not to be stated. The heart of the debate is about the things…
-
comment
Comment #45449503
> The Haskell looks much better, and I don't even know Haskell Plain crazy take. The c example uses basic coding to implement some clever maths with special fast instructions. Theh…
-
comment
Comment #45447523
It’s slow. Example: quicksort [] = [] quicksort (p:xs) = (quicksort lesser) ++ [p] ++ (quicksort greater) where lesser = filter ( = p) xs It’s really complicated. Everybody include…
-
comment
Comment #45442952
Man I hate functional programming so much. Please, to anyone reading this. Don’t waste your time on this stuff. They always try to claim functional code makes things safer and more…
-
comment
Comment #41520282
> Could you imagine people saying the issue with Java is its extremism towards objects and method calls? I think exactly that all the time. It’s ridiculous. > That's a problem no h…
-
comment
Comment #41519809
I’ve been working with pure functional languages and custom lisp dialects professionally my whole tenure. You get a whole bag of problems for a very subjective upside. Teams fragme…
-
comment
Comment #41519482
An example of how to use the io monad for simulations https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/... It’s one of the nicer to read ones I’ve seen. Still is terribl…
-
comment
Comment #40241218
Most database companies run only a small amount of tests before committing. After committing, you run tests for thousands of hours. It sucks. You probably do this all day every day…
- comment
-
story
Declarative Programming is a business model
Strap in for some truth: Declarative programming isn't a programming language paradigm, but a crafty business model. Marketed as a solution, it's as declarative as a mute parrot. L…
-
comment
Comment #32836467
You simply use "intuitive mathematics", in other words: no formalization. That's at least what I got when I read books on set theory. Löwenheim-Skolem implies the existence of a co…
-
comment
Comment #32834718
Yeah but second order logic itself is incomplete. ZFC doesn't have a single model, too, btw. In the end unprovable sentences exist because there are multiple models satisfying your…
-
comment
Comment #32830864
True, but if you add too many axioms, the resulting set of axioms will not be computable anymore. If you allow your set of axioms to not be computable you can of course just use th…
-
comment
Comment #30476559
This is a mischaracterisation of gödels incompleteness theorem. The set of axioms the theorem is about isn't even mentioned in the article. This is very important. If you pick the …