Viewing profile — bch8_
bch8_
HN member- Joined
- Sat, May 02, 2026, 12:50 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bch8_
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48052015
Can you share this recent evidence about communication through fields?
-
comment
Comment #48051919
I went on a very similar trajectory to you w.r.t to the paper (From a similar starting point too). Just wanted to mention that the idea you are describing here is in principle comp…
-
comment
Comment #48027688
First I want to say I don't think this is an unreasonable position nor does it appear to be one without some degree of support in the expert debates. The position taken by this pap…
-
comment
Comment #48004847
No that's not an implication of the argument. You are misunderstanding. It is not necessary to continuously inject increasingly complicated historical scenarios, I am not going to …
-
comment
Comment #48003465
No because it doesn't physically instantiate the concept of 3:00pm. By the author's contention if you go and find an analog clock right now and read the time, the clock still doesn…
-
comment
Comment #47993719
To the best of my understanding I believe the response from the position taken by the paper is that this is still committing the abstraction fallacy (Assuming you aren't just agree…
-
comment
Comment #47982358
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47982286
I had the same initial thought but to be fair the paper addresses this explicitly and the author believes their argument can hold without fully understanding consciousness
-
comment
Comment #47982243
The paper addresses this point in section 3.2. They aren't debating the fact that a physical process is taking place in a computer running a program. They are arguing that the sema…