Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — baxter001

baxter001

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jul 22, 2008, 9:16 AM UTC
HN karma
434
Public activity
162 items

About baxter001

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44947242

    [flagged]

  2. comment
    Comment #44946734

    [flagged]

  3. comment
    Comment #44927194

    I recall doing a rather large technical case for using raft and a replicated log for water industry back in 2017 it must have been. That's from knowing nothing about the shape of c…

  4. comment
    Comment #44925119

    > I was surprised how well the bird was getting around. SurvivorBias.png except it's a silhouette of a goose with numerous red arrows drawn over it.

  5. comment
    Comment #44895934

    You'd be surprised what's in there, a few forms of NNs are already supported for denoising, speech detection. I think having this flow out to all of the deps of libav is a greater …

  6. comment
    Comment #44895923

    More precisely libavfilter, so it's also soon in mpv and other dependent players. This is going to be great for real-time audio translation.

  7. comment
    Comment #44620697

    The fact that you think it was suggested _by_ them is I think where your mental model is misleading you. LLMs can be thought of metaphorically as a process of decompression, if you…

  8. comment
    Comment #43859489

    What technologies we have in 2025!

  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #42416055

    [flagged]

  11. comment
    Comment #38740127

    It seems to be the "conversation" part, not necessarily "communication", one of the early stages in children's language acquisition is teaching the flow of back and forth responses…

  12. comment
    Comment #38334163

    No, it doesn't, Turk is what we call Turkish people too.

  13. story
    Ask HN: Handing reviewee yearly reward discussions

    Getting to the end of the year when me and my senior team are rationalizing performance reviews for next January. Last year with inflation peaking at 11.1% - we normalise to a stan…

  14. comment
    Comment #38237132

    The "chemical burns" in the title are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_mustard burns, a blistering agent and schedule 1 substance under the chemical weapons convention.

  15. comment
    Comment #29646726

    Completely not the focus of the article, and you've turned the result of an error rate of 0.8 percent for gender classification of light-skinned men and a 34.7 percent error rate f…

  16. comment
    Comment #29011161

    Always curious of how you walk around the latent space in these, are you just linearly interpolating between two random high dimension points?

  17. comment
    Comment #26895784

    background for those unfamiliar with this: https://news.itsfoss.com/hypocrite-commits/ and Kangjie Lu's response: https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~kjlu/papers/clarifications-hc....

  18. comment
    Comment #26581970

    When I'm bored and looking for distraction, I'll often get as far as reader.goog in the address bar before I remember :(

  19. comment
    Comment #26050083

    That opening paragraph is hellishly depressing.

  20. comment
    Comment #26038121

    It's an article post on the paywalled site platformer.news (Alexa Rank 57,888, most of the sites visitors coming from cnewton.org) by the San Francisco based founder and writer of …

  21. comment
    Comment #25834858

    A meta-response: https://www.scimex.org/newsfeed/should-we-pause-the-5g-roll-...

  22. comment
    Comment #25822487

    Can't let this pass without the old classic: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/704080v1 In the United States, supercentenarian status is predicted by the absence of vital reg…

  23. comment
    Comment #25773917

    No, but it's pretty good at retraining the final layer of low memory networks like MobileNet - weirdly a workload that the V100 is very poorly suited for...

  24. comment
    Comment #25647976

    Almost a yearly tradition: https://www.congress.gov/search?q={%22source%22:%22legislati...

  25. comment
    Comment #25159867

    A retraction for being one week out with their predictions and not expecting a new vaccine to get exceptional early distribution authorization?