Viewing profile — batou
batou
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 26, 2015, 3:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 987
- Public activity
- 301 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About batou
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #9987875
It's expensive to keep binary groups online (bandwidth) and the text groups are all SPAM these days. Edit: Forgot to say that the tech is fine; a member of my family operates a use…
-
comment
Comment #9987490
I understand LINQ very well (right down to code generation and expression trees) but unfortunately I work with a lot of other people's code. Perhaps that is the problem? :-) More s…
-
comment
Comment #9987474
We do no LINQ near the database so some of those assumptions aren't valid here. We use NH criteria for that. The coalesce operator in C# 5 is welcome but then introduces another pr…
-
comment
Comment #9987444
The problem is that it's a complex trade off whichever way you turn. Knowing which trade off to make is difficult for many people as it requires knowing all of the assumptions and …
-
comment
Comment #9987407
Not a great fan of LINQ if I'm honest. Sure it's terse and powerful but with it comes great responsibility and a relatively large pile of tasty landmines. Three regular problems I …
-
comment
Comment #9984464
Conversely it hosed my test machine (a clone of my main one). I would never risk a shotgun upgrade; I can't afford to lose a day fixing it. YMMV basically.
-
comment
Comment #9983646
Compare to the Fiat Doblo Owner's Manual, which happens to be "Doblo eLEARN technical manual" because the effing thing breaks every 2 minutes... I long for a simple vehicle again.
-
comment
Comment #9982240
You're right, but "least shit" is not the best position to occupy.
-
comment
Comment #9982202
My entire outlay is now a single laptop running CentOS 7, a desktop as a backup machine if I kill the laptop, some earphones, a dumbphone and a USB stick and USB mp3 player in the …
-
comment
Comment #9982069
I'm right there now. I just simplified everything by going back and looking for the technological singularity where everything just worked. This is a really hard and uncomfortable …
-
comment
Comment #9982043
I've never had coffee come out of my nose before. Thank you for that experience :) I just sat through an hour of shit like that. My eyelids were so heavy they nearly became a singu…
-
comment
Comment #9981309
Look for smaller companies and individual recruiters first. If they get you an interview in under 48 hours for a non shonky outfit and are willing to discuss your terms rather than…
-
comment
Comment #9981240
I think that's not true. They do not consider their privacy nor understand the consequences.
-
comment
Comment #9981024
You're right on all the points there. I did find that you can play recruiters off against each other quite easily to negotiate a higher rate. Also when you sign, you sign with the …
-
comment
Comment #9980606
Very true. Also the advice about marketing yourself is crap. Recruiters are the #1 way of landing contracts. They're finders and you're paying a finders fee for that service. They …
-
comment
Comment #9979188
Conversations (SMS backup), photos (onedrive), email (outlook/office365), calls (skype) etc etc.
-
comment
Comment #9979150
No one wanted this implementation. There are plenty of ways of solving exactly the problems without the amorphous concept of the cloud without introducing any burden on the user. I…
-
comment
Comment #9979136
I spent a number of years working for nefarious defence contractors so the paranoia is somewhat justified. My paranoia is clearly required as I've been responsible for the security…
-
comment
Comment #9979021
I assure you this is not specious. We have to test against the lowest common denominator so we're not using Enterprise or VL for this nor are the machines domain members. The priva…
-
comment
Comment #9979006
That's fine. That's no different to an IP address or a DNS record or something that you'd put on an envelope. That is public information. The content of our communications is the m…
-
comment
Comment #9978384
No as that information is public. What we talk about isn't.
-
comment
Comment #9978373
I was a QRP operator so that's actually quite funny.
-
comment
Comment #9978267
This is incidentally why I run a hefty firewall for outgoing traffic and most endpoints can't access the internet at all.
-
comment
Comment #9978142
I'm actually not free to not use it. I have to test our product on these systems and therefore I will need at least a virtual machine instance of it. I have no option not to use a …
-
comment
Comment #9978103
Yes. It's as dumb as a 3310.