Viewing profile — bassislife
bassislife
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 10:10 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 56
- Public activity
- 35 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About bassislife
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #13815214
Adding to the list the very important Kanem-Bornou Empire and Bagirmi Kingdom.
-
comment
Comment #13278089
I think it was humor :)
-
comment
Comment #13277466
Yes, for instance, it's easy to create concurrent programs that are semantically wrong (in other words inadequate for use) albeit correct in terms of "types" because the coder made…
-
comment
Comment #13277444
"unsafety" rather ? ;) decreasing non-safety is not the same as increasing safety. One starts with the assumption that things are safe. The other does not.
-
comment
Comment #13277437
> A good type system (e.g Rust's, Haskell's..) can eliminate all type errors from your programs. It will eliminate errors related to the use of a given programming language. It wil…
-
comment
Comment #13277347
The issue with safety is that nothing is really safe. Once you have some level of safety in your programming language, you realize that there are still a lot of other sources of ha…
-
comment
Comment #13201266
Your proposal only works if you don't need ABI-compatibility, especially relevant if the build process needs to be parallelizable. It all depends on what sense you provide to the t…
-
comment
Comment #13193328
That's not different from having a bad leader ruling forever... That's torture. 1789 occured for a reason.
-
comment
Comment #13192493
All these dictators in Africa ruling for (eternal) life ?!! What a nightmare !
-
comment
Comment #13184473
> Treating different major versions as different packages For emphasis, because I think that's what should ideally happen.
-
comment
Comment #12952319
If you are Seebeck, where are Peltier and Thomson? ;)
-
comment
Comment #12823716
> they are all defined with fmt.Errorf No, an error implements the error interface. It means that it can be a value of any type that implements the constraint of having an Error me…
-
comment
Comment #12822925
You can test the interface. A type is just an interface around memory, albeit more consrained.
-
comment
Comment #12296938
It's problematic for dependency management. It's almost perfect but what would be better would be to be able to switch easily between different $GOPATH. One per project. We can alr…
-
comment
Comment #12296307
Release the Hounds.... The Hounds have been released. Go is released seems fine to me.
-
comment
Comment #12290537
Anxiety is probably environment-induced. Kids are not necessarily so anxious.
-
comment
Comment #12190122
In Go, each version corresponds to a given import/Pkg path. If you want to change version (major), you need to create a new package. The advantage is that you do not have to downlo…
-
comment
Comment #12179647
Which I guess is normal since it does not create any dependency cycle. A new version might as well be thought as a completely different package (of perhaps similar functionality).
-
comment
Comment #11776334
If there is a market for the education you received, it should. If the job market conditions change, it might not unless the person is resourceful. Also note that the OP is talking…
-
comment
Comment #11714934
A very nice explanation about what covariance and contravariance mean, especially in the context of subtyping (with potential parametric polymorphism). And implementation details a…
- story
-
comment
Comment #11607669
For category theory, I don't think so. But if we take tensor algebra, of course, in physics, especially quantum mechanics .The thing is, you could approach the same physical proble…
-
comment
Comment #11605899
> But maybe monads are too exotic to provide a good example. Nah, it's fine. But a monad is just a part of an abstraction. Which also means that they have been used without that sp…
-
comment
Comment #11224029
Well maybe an example of something related to the game of Go written in Go should be planned in the future then. :)
-
comment
Comment #11039054
so "=== gefahrlos" ?