Viewing profile — barumi

Just because a company managed to do stuff a certain way that does not mean that way is the right way or adequate or good. Enough with this cargo cult bullshit approach to technica…

>>I think this only solves the problem for the API owner, not the consumer, right? The only problem this solves is their need to sell their product. This so-called "schema-driven d…

> That freedom of Linux comes at a cost that people aren't paid to take care of the level of details other OS have. What do you mean "take care of the level of detail"? I can downl…

> The amount of weird issues is about constant. But linux is free both as in free beer and in free speech, windows required you to pay the Microsoft tax to use, and lastly macOS re…

> While those prices seem pretty good for first world countries, many of the people in my country don't make more than $1000 per month, so it'd still be a substantial investment. T…

> VIM is ideal for people who find it worthwhile to spend the time building their configuration out. I've been using VIM for over a decade and currently my customized config consis…

> But in academia, and I suppose in a criminal gang, everyone has the same skillset. PhDs are notionally being trained with the specific abilities necessary to become a professor. …

> Because it's a stupid statement when there are companies that are making more money (...) Again, that makes zero sense and is another blatant red herring. If the discussion is ab…

Sounds to me like taxing WFH fits the description of "ruining everything good with taxation". I mean, there's already a progressive income tax. Why should society create incentives…

From the article: > But when I showed off my build on /r/homelab, reddit’s homelab subcommunity, they mocked me as a filthy casual because I used consumer parts. The cool kids used…

> On the other hand, with marriage, it's generally (hopefully) safe to assume that both parties trust each other fully before entering into the agreement. Whether and how that play…

> They can't help but penalize change. I don't believe it has anything to do with change. I believe it has everything to do with isolating a vulnerable subset of society to exploit…

> Examples of large, modern societies flourishing without the use of taxation? This is a disingenuous red herring. It's one thing to claim that some amount of taxes to finance publ…

> I would gladly contribute a larger share of my income as taxes to ensure my community doesn't suffer (...) I would too, which is why I vote with my wallet and buy local, even at …

> Deutsche Bank placed number one in money laundering. How does that ad hominem refute or support the claim that remote workers should be taxed to subsidize vulnerable jobs?

> Even though they're technically different concepts, I've found in practice they're almost always coupled together. Not really. Event sourcing is typically implemented with CQRS, …

>>I'm saying that REST also separates reads from writes in almost identical capacity. Not really. REST just models everything as resources that are targetted by requests. REST stat…

CQRS+ES is more about event sourcing and not as much about CQRS. The hard part about the scheme is the CAP theorem stuff, not how operations are segregated into commands and querie…

> The biggest drawback I've seen to CQRS - particularly in an event driven architecture - has been increased complexity, usually in exchange for increased scalability. I fail to se…

> A dog whistle for what? There's an awful lot of cagey presumption going on in every reiteration of this claim. I'm not a US citizen nor I ever set foot in the US, and even from a…

> There is a difference between being in bad taste and being illegal. It's called "letter of the law" vs "spirit of the law", Purposely violating the principle of the law by abusin…

> "The intention behind the rules" is a thing that lives in your imagination. No, it's pretty straight-forward. There's no healthy democracy that believes that a blatantly partial …

> The main feature of git flow is having multiple redundant branches for no reason. Namely a separate develop and master. This statement is simply wrong and ignorant. The reason wh…

> The author of "GitFlow Considered Harmful" put out a simpler workflow that achieves all the upsides of GitFlow with none of the downsides: I see no relevant difference between th…

> I don't know what you think git-flow is, but a linear history it is not. Your statement makes no sense at all. Gitflow is a workflow. What do you believe it's supposed to be? It'…