Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — barthelomew

barthelomew

HN member
Joined
Mon, Aug 19, 2019, 2:26 AM UTC
HN karma
229
Public activity
35 items

About barthelomew

ML research; debargha@case.edu

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
    Comment #47213489

    Yes, indeed! This work uses the Proof of Thought library and several techniques from VERGE!

  3. comment
    Comment #47213340

    AI (VLM-based) radiology models can sound confident and still be wrong ; hallucinating diagnoses that their own findings don't support. This is a silent, and dangerous failure mode…

  4. story
  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #46729591

    Predict your distributed LLM training time before you burn GPU hours. We've open-sourced a tool ( https://github.com/DebarghaG/estimate-train-time ) that estimates wall-clock time …

  7. story
  8. story
  9. comment
    Comment #45890640

    You can get bonuses though. The optimization algorithms do not get bonuses.

  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #45567156

    Paper LaTeX files often contain surprising details. When a paper lacks code, looking at latex source has become a part of my reproduction workflow. The comments often reveal non-tr…

  12. comment
    Comment #45476784

    Yep! Datalog syntax for Z3 is pretty neat! We used SMT [1] in our grammars paper because it allowed the most interoperability with solvers, but our technique also works with PROLOG…

  13. comment
    Comment #45476568

    Hey! Thank you for the interest! I shall do that. Meanwhile, check out Page 11 onwards. We describe a lot of situations! ( https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.17270 )

  14. comment
    Comment #45476405

    You're right about the 2023 JSON mode, but our project required enforcing a much more complex DSL grammar (look in Appendix for details), not just ensuring a *valid JSON object*. T…

  15. comment
    Comment #45476286

    Yep, this is a genuine problem, and this is what we term as the autoformalization gap in our follow up paper. ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20047 ) Some LLMs are more consistent bet…

  16. comment
    Comment #45476244

    Yep. The paper was written last year with GPT-4o. Things have become a lot better since then with newer models. E.g. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.20047 Tab 1, we compare the performa…

  17. comment
    Comment #45476140

    Hey, yes! This is because the DSL (Domain Specific Language) is pretty complex, and the LLM finds it hard. We prototype a much more effective version using SMT in our NeurIPS 2025 …

  18. comment
    Comment #45476117

    Hey there! I mostly designed and wrote most of the actual interpreter during my internship at Microsoft Research last summer. Constrained decoding for GPT-4 wasn’t available when w…

  19. comment
    Comment #45476083

    Yep! I have read your work! Pretty cool! I also worked on a similar deep research agent for autoformalization this summer at AWS ARChecks, building on similar patterns. Although th…

  20. comment
    Comment #45476050

    The autoformalization gap is pretty difficult to bridge indeed. We explored uncertainty quantification of autoformalization on well-defined grammars in our NeurIPS 2025 paper : htt…

  21. story
  22. story
  23. story
  24. story
  25. story