Viewing profile — barneso
barneso
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 20, 2015, 12:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 28
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About barneso
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #12404936
What I find most exciting here is that they were able to improve performance by combining the three previous steps into one, in other words asking directly for what they wanted rat…
-
comment
Comment #11865941
That is a good origin story! I would contend though that it was the performing of the data analytics on himself (which helped keep it top of mind and helped him to develop an inter…
-
comment
Comment #11862629
I'm a diabetic (type one, since 1988) who has also been doing ML startups for the last 15 years. My HbA1C scores have always been below 6, controlled with a two to four blood test …
-
comment
Comment #11597651
Most teams I have seen have either template scripts or boilerplate that generates datasets, and share both the generated data and the scripts via normal ways that people share data…
-
comment
Comment #11565964
The Tensorflow code mentions "GCUDACC" in several places, and from the surrounding comments it seems to be targeted at OpenCL as well as CUDA. So it seems that this has been at lea…
-
comment
Comment #11427348
It's very hard to find a viable business model in machine learning or AI tools and platforms at the moment: the size of the market is small, and most money is being made by the end…
-
comment
Comment #11226809
In my experience, the architecture supports cards with shader model >= 3.0. Occasionally a commit will break the support (eg https://bitbucket.org/eigen/eigen/commits/a19653b8035d8…
-
comment
Comment #11120615
Better, if the processes are on the same machine you could use it to share the data via shared memory or a common memory mapping, to avoid having copies of the data on each end of …
-
comment
Comment #11117201
Once the open source version of Tensorflow releases multi-node support, this would be one way to make it work. There are potential gains from using a GPU for RF training. As for di…
-
comment
Comment #11114771
None of the systems include the data load time, but for mldb and the other non-distributed systems, it's only a few seconds. (edit: my grammar is good not)
-
comment
Comment #11114663
There are plenty of alternatives out there to Spark ML: here is a survey of RF implementations: https://github.com/szilard/benchm-ml/tree/master/z-other-too... There is a whole oth…
-
comment
Comment #11114647
They do provide some very useful pre-trained models, eg the full parameter set for their Inception model.
-
comment
Comment #11114641
For profiling of models, almost everything needed is already there. You only need to pass in a StepStatsCollector through the Session::Run() method (I called it RunWithStats() ) an…
-
comment
Comment #10247456
It seems that MLDB would be a decent fit for this use-case. You would be able to do pre-processing in the background continuously, and predictions could do a significant amount of …
-
comment
Comment #10247233
(Founder here). Could you describe your use-case? This is an interesting question and I'd love to hear more about what you are thinking of. There are two main parts to most machine…
-
comment
Comment #9080407
I would still expect it to tend towards the normal distribution across a large set of documents. If you model positive and negative word counts as a binomial distribution, you have…
-
comment
Comment #9080254
You are right; this does just shift the bias, which is sometimes all you need (you have a simple algorithm, presumably for a reason). I did misunderstand that you don't have a trai…
-
comment
Comment #9080100
Two simple things you could do: 1. Insert each negative example six times into your training set (or weight negative examples accordingly, ie use #positive matches - 6 * #negative …