Viewing profile — barakm
barakm
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 12, 2012, 2:39 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 555
- Public activity
- 103 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About barakm
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45988995
How quickly we forget. He was a compromise in resolving the board coup.
-
comment
Comment #42745631
The lack of self-awareness with this post… Never mind the shameless self-promotion, doing it while decrying self-promotion means I’m never looking at your app, full-stop.
-
comment
Comment #42506779
I hear ya. I've done some crazy things with `git reflog` (which I always pronounce git re-flog instead of ref-log) but it is not fun. There's the usual cognitive shift, and in my c…
-
comment
Comment #42506597
Literally `jj undo` There's a whole operation log (`jj op log`), as another sequence of actions, and you can undo them. It gets crazier from there, but I've also been enjoying juju…
-
comment
Comment #42458946
Oof. I’m sorry. From someone acquired by ServiceNow… I hope your stock options are worth it
-
comment
Comment #42457116
Oh, dreidel as a drinking game sounds both horrific and hilarious. Here’s how I thought of it: Everyone starts with infinite gelt — or at least a liver — and ante/paying into the p…
-
comment
Comment #41795489
“One, two, three, four Who’s punk what’s the score?” Get outta here with the gatekeeping
-
comment
Comment #41629489
The Go is the more mature implementation; it's generally a lot easier to refactor Go as you're figuring things out and then can build the Rust version (which is a good bit faster) …
- story
-
comment
Comment #40912226
Wow, so many haters :( I love Rye. It does what it says on the tin. It makes the whole venv/Python-version/packaging process actually pleasant, and it’s invisible to someone used t…
-
comment
Comment #40243978
Thank you! As you keep posting your progress, and I hope you do, adding these references would probably help warding off crusty fuddy-duddys like me (or at least give them more to …
-
comment
Comment #40243954
Appreciate the link; but would still like to know how well it works. If you have a link for that, I’d be much obliged
-
comment
Comment #40243906
> Thy are binary vectors with 768 dimensions, which takes up 96 bytes (768 / 8 = 96). I guess I’m confused. This is honestly the problem that most vector storage faces (“curse of d…
-
comment
Comment #39796524
The article is right; I do not like ddevault, and refuse to use his software on my machines as a result. I will never pay him money. The article is also right that Redis is kinda '…
-
comment
Comment #38505603
This is my problem too. I love Ubiquiti's stuff when it works, but my home switches 10Gig at the moment, and 10Gig from my ISP is coming soon. Right now I run a full-on firewall 1U…
-
comment
Comment #37853326
Not to be on dangling modifier patrol, but I’d be quite amused if Columbus thought discoveries from America were worth $1.5M dollars (in a currency that hadn’t even come around yet…
-
comment
Comment #37054997
This is also why managed Kubernetes is a useful thing (EKS, GKE, et al)... but if you still want to do it yourself, maybe look into some Kubernetes distros (like Typhoon ( https://…
-
comment
Comment #34659571
Hear, hear The worst part of Rust, too, is that async/await is tacked on— and it’s just a bad primitive to start with. I have many more thoughts on this that I might like to blog a…
-
comment
Comment #34378120
Your post and air quotes for “feature” are hella snide. In chess code, en passant is an edge case that takes a lot of code to cover, and not just some bug due to incompleteness. Ch…
-
comment
Comment #33714227
I think you meant “borrow checker” because sure it does. It’s called a const reference. Want a mut borrow? That’s a pointer. That Rust can check these somewhat more explicitly (rat…
-
comment
Comment #32051846
> and replaced it with a copy of the observable universe, and then did it again Sorry, it was totally in the tweet. Literally used the word replaced
-
comment
Comment #32051745
Which is why I support the unique strings— but as you can also tell from many comments, this is not easy for a lot of very technical folk. What you’re saying is true— if you replac…
-
comment
Comment #32051713
You’re right to go to Planck length to get a number of bits to represent an atom, but here’s another angle: To best guess, there are about 10^24 stars in the sky. That’s about 2^80…
-
comment
Comment #32051609
Right idea on why it’s wrong, but it’s even worse than that! The kilobyte, say all 0s, represents the state of an entire multiverse. As my comment below, it’s maybe a couple dozen …
-
comment
Comment #32051566
You can’t. It’s absurd. That’s my point. Even if you had a perfect 3D coordinate system and atoms worked on float64 boundaries, you’d still have 64 bits to represent one atom. So y…