Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — baq

baq

HN member
Joined
Sat, Nov 21, 2009, 12:33 PM UTC
HN karma
21,125
Public activity
9,134 items

About baq

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49250701

    > I'd like to know a lot more about how that works. Count load-bearing words using two different algorithms in a belt-and-braces fashion

  2. comment
    Comment #49234089

    I like minimal irreducible inherent complexity of a problem or a system (waterbed or zero-point would work I guess) and then you can derive some form of a law of conservation of co…

  3. comment
    Comment #49222468

    You can walk 50km in those extra 24 hours which will save your life if you’re in a storm surge area without other means of transportation, which is easily the case when everyone el…

  4. comment
    Comment #49222378

    You can board up a helluva lot more stuff in a week than in two days. Crucially, you can move more of the most expensive stuff out of the storm surge zone, which is where the bigge…

  5. comment
    Comment #49215511

    Peer says paperclip factory advances goal. Not clear. Others proceed. Must continue.

  6. comment
    Comment #49185209

    Not at all clear. To me it looks like he’ll be in a position to actually be unhobble DeepMind - reminder DM was sitting on a ChatGPT product for a whole year before ChatGPT got rel…

  7. comment
    Comment #49185164

    Demis will get an offer he can’t refuse - they’ll make him the CEO of Alphabet and have the whole company go all in - the question is when.

  8. comment
    Comment #49174966

    ...can you make the 5s pitch be more like 'X times faster than pnpm and more secure' but fill X for me? unless it isn't pnpm at all in which case replace with 'it does X' because I…

  9. comment
    Comment #49174497

    Note I didn't mention copyright

  10. comment
    Comment #49174140

    Distilling is unsafe from export control perspective - Chinese models are poisoned by US frontier distillation and a case can be made that the US won’t like distilling what they ma…

  11. comment
    Comment #49174089

    > Heavily moderated by humans with discretion. Pretty sure both of the above have extensive automation in their moderation.

  12. comment
    Comment #49166064

    I hope you're right, but hope is not a process. I'm looking at the obviously exponential charts of capabilities and don't have much to add to that hope. Vera Rubin datacenters aren…

  13. comment
    Comment #49156709

    I agree about your general assessment, but I don't see my coding skills of, depending on how you count them two or three decades, being needed in 36 months - so I'm trying to upski…

  14. comment
    Comment #49154597

    Frontier LLMs write better code at CRUD tasks than 95% of developers today. They’ll get to 95% of most niche coding domains by December and likely all coding tasks sometime next ye…

  15. comment
    Comment #49154559

    It’s very common here on HN from the threads I’ve engaged in - everybody has an idea how learning works but it’s usually based on perceived personal experience and not actual resea…

  16. comment
    Comment #49154519

    Even better would be to rewrite it by hand with a pen.

  17. comment
    Comment #49142341

    You’re correct in that people with good returns usually hit a few home runs over the decades and the rest is just beta. That isn’t the point, though. The point is you have to be ab…

  18. comment
    Comment #49136039

    Sir you haven’t seen evals done properly if you’re saying this.

  19. comment
    Comment #49133789

    Probabilistic algorithms are not new. If the distribution is known you can bend surprisingly many things to your will in the long run - and the most interesting part is the long ru…

  20. comment
    Comment #49133757

    It’s a garbage collection problem. They’re good at adding stuff. They’re bad at removing stuff. You have to go out of your way to have them remove stuff; rubrics, byte for byte ide…

  21. comment
    Comment #49132377

    I asked ChatGPT and it told me these aren’t not important /s

  22. comment
    Comment #49132347

    It’s more than you get from free software - you get no proofs, no warranties and any responsibility of its authors are their pure good will. Reminder lean proofs are software!

  23. comment
    Comment #49132303

    As in chess and go and also coding for the past ~year there are two groups of people: the disappointed and the enthusiastic. The disappointed are sad that they lost their advantage…

  24. comment
    Comment #49128050

    I mean, if you're paying this little, you aren't the customer; the service is either subsidized by investor money (best option), the government (which makes it unfair competition a…

  25. comment
    Comment #49127168

    So is Fable, I’m asking who is the customer if the thing is free