Viewing profile — baggiponte
baggiponte
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 19, 2021, 6:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 123
- Public activity
- 101 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About baggiponte
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45074794
I’m afraid you missed a bit the mark :( This is the equivalent of LSP but for coding agents. So any editor does not have to rebuild an interface to support each and every new one.
-
comment
Comment #45074233
Really hope for this to get traction so I’m not bound to the usual IDE
-
comment
Comment #44985927
i think it's good to let them experiment! cargo (and go?) offers this already, so why not.
-
comment
Comment #44985912
uv ruffy sounds funny
-
comment
Comment #44864403
Wow I never realized how much mistral was “disconnected” from the ecosystem
-
comment
Comment #44856185
How’s this different from xml?
-
comment
Comment #44846951
Yeah. The docs tell you that you should build it yourself, but…
-
comment
Comment #44819667
Litestar is really underrated but deserves much more usage! I’ve been meaning to try it for at least a year now, but always felt a bit scary to tell the team “hey let’s deviate fro…
-
comment
Comment #44307249
Yeah they might be good but the marketing is really bold and, to a certain extent, arrogant if not outright disgusting.
-
comment
Comment #44109076
BasedPyright is much better than pyright! Must use.
-
comment
Comment #44014574
That’s not true, they have been developing it as red knot for a good while :)
-
comment
Comment #43901162
You basically pay databricks a “fee” to choose the more appropriate and modern stack for you to build on, and keep it up to date. Never used it, but it handles with lots of the adm…
-
comment
Comment #43768011
This looks so dope!
-
comment
Comment #43749700
sqlalchemy doesn’t really accepts strings - if you do, you need to pass them into a “conn.execute(text(…))”, so end users should not face a breaking change.
-
comment
Comment #43749680
Type checkers to the rescue ahaha I think db.get could also raise if the type does not match?
-
comment
Comment #42869290
OpenAI coping so hard
-
comment
Comment #42868332
he's coping so hard.
-
comment
Comment #42314900
Oh you maintain PyTorch right?
-
comment
Comment #42191409
Absolutely. No second thoughts.
-
comment
Comment #41995686
also a whole bunch of new features (--script mode), speed of development, a stacked team.
-
comment
Comment #41995677
Yes but only for linting (the flake8 rules etc). The end goal is to have proper type checking and, I think, proper LSP refactoring capabilities.
-
comment
Comment #41995666
they are working on it! the internal name is currently red-knot (you can see it in their GH History and in the discord). First thing is a type checker, I think, then the renaming c…
-
comment
Comment #41584025
Super interested. Do you have an equivalent of vLLM? Did you have to rewrite batching, paged attention…?
-
comment
Comment #41583939
Uuuh can you tell a bit more about wasabi, the Python LSP? Saw a post years ago and been eager to see whether it’d be open sourced (or why it wouldn’t).
-
comment
Comment #41571151
Have you seen two “prototypes” of standard for LLM telemetry? One is openllmetry, maintained by the folks at TraceLoop. Seems the more popular. The other one is openinference IIRC,…