Viewing profile — babypistol
babypistol
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Nov 01, 2015, 9:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 20
- Public activity
- 16 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About babypistol
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46330844
What is up with this argument that LLMs cannot be Turing complete? > There is a simple argument showing that GPTs, even with an infinite context window, cannot be Turing complete. …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #22506667
I have used DuckDuckGo a couple of years back, but, after some more consideration switched back to Google. Apart from privacy I never really liked the direction DuckDuckGo was goin…
-
comment
Comment #17506941
Calling it a myth implies that there is adequate evidence to refute it. By your reasoning we could also be talking about the Giving-Free-Cash-To-The-Poor-Will-Make-Them-Productive …
-
comment
Comment #17208235
I don't understand why you are responding to me in such a condescending tone, but thanks anyway for the discussion. I'm well aware that P vs NP is a very hard question (I have stud…
-
comment
Comment #17207585
Well that's the problem, man. And asymptotically is not the right word either, because n^3 is asymptotically different from n^2. You probably meant poly-time reducible, whichs is q…
-
comment
Comment #17207439
Thanks for the explanation. But, I do have some comments: 1) As far as a I can tell the fact that PRIMES is in P doesn't mean breaking RSA is. The problem in rsa is integer factori…
-
comment
Comment #17206115
Well I'm trying to understand why this question is big. The fact that the exponents tend to be small in the algorithms that our puny brains were able to produce does not convince m…
-
comment
Comment #17204123
Yeah, in this case we are back to square one and P vs NP again seems irrelevant to me.
-
comment
Comment #17203915
I have always been puzzled by why we as computer scientists give such importance to P vs NP. I always thought that even if P = NP the solutions might still be much harder (but only…
-
comment
Comment #17203817
In my opinion P = NP does not mean that. There still might be a big polynomial difference between verifying a solution and finding one.
-
comment
Comment #17203789
I haven't heard of EMH before today and can't really comment on that. But it seems to me that even in the example from your note the stock price will tend to reflect the the correc…
-
comment
Comment #16844748
Maybe it's just me, but I really don't like this view in this case. Crypto in cryptocurrency still stands for cryptographic and by using crypto for cryptocurrency we are making thi…
-
comment
Comment #16844466
Oh, I meant paper as a material. (And you probably got that.)
-
comment
Comment #16844358
I think the problem is that blockcain fans mostly don't care about real crypto :) and use "crypto" as a synonym for digital currency. To me, saying "crypto" means blockchain seems …
-
comment
Comment #16028809
I don't understand why people still do this type of "X will grow" predictions. You have nothing to lose by making such predictions, just like how everyone who predicted the rise of…