Viewing profile — b101010
b101010
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 28, 2015, 9:14 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 31
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About b101010
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17133711
Have a look at dn42. https://dn42.net/Home
-
comment
Comment #15256209
The "malicious" code at the end of the advisory looks like nothing more than a beacon announcing it was installed? edit: get current working directory get username get hostname con…
-
comment
Comment #15163541
php-cli scripts normally don't have an execution time limit (or a memory limit?), which makes them ideal for upgrades/database maintenance/cron jobs/etc while being able to reuse c…
-
comment
Comment #14920022
The share links look like this https:// send.firefox.com/download/ /# Data after the # in the url should not be sent to the http server by the client. Encryption/decryption is pres…
-
comment
Comment #13072456
part of this can be done with openSSH by setting the banner option in sshd_config. "Banner The contents of the specified file are sent to the remote user before authentication is a…
-
comment
Comment #12720370
Would (a) not be a. Cache files are added to when _something causes a request for_ IPFS content The distinction being that "something" is not always a direct action from the user. …
-
comment
Comment #12693541
For anyone wanting to do this, the profile and no-remote command line options[1] may be useful if you want to create shortcuts to launch specific profiles You might also want to co…
-
comment
Comment #12010309
If the attacker has ever seen the headers of a message you sent through fastmails SMTP service they have your public IP (Received from header) and can Dos you directly anyway. They…
-
comment
Comment #11996577
After some thought, The only advantage of signing before and after i can think of is without it you are left with the (theoretical?) problem of not knowing if the output from your …
-
comment
Comment #11995027
Why is the debate about "compress/encrypt then sign" vs "sign then compress/encrypt"? Is there a non obvious problem with sign then compress/encrypt then sign again? (overcomplicat…
-
comment
Comment #11594878
"Disk drives depend on the head floating on a cushion of air, they are not designed to operate in a vacuum" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_height
-
comment
Comment #11534099
Some of the commissions objections are outlined here, does anyone have a better source? http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-1492_en.htm
-
comment
Comment #10039763
I have seen several suggestions along the following lines as far back as the original blog post which announced the intention to require extension signing Allow an extension signin…
-
comment
Comment #9692426
Why are the packages from chocolatey trusted? I am not familiar with chocolatey but the powershell script on https://chocolatey.org/packages/filezilla (click show files) contains t…
-
comment
Comment #8958879
You can also roll back lvm snapshots using the merge option https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterp...