Viewing profile — awesomekling
awesomekling
HN member- Joined
- Fri, May 09, 2014, 9:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,434
- Public activity
- 305 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About awesomekling
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43856271
Very interesting, I was not familiar with your project. Thanks for sharing it here!
-
comment
Comment #43856196
Whatever happens, large parts of the codebase + dependencies will be C++ (or C) for the foreseeable future. We're working on integrating with Swift, but despite the team's earnest …
-
comment
Comment #43854865
This is awesome! Really great write-up, and solid work by Jessie :^) The Ladybird codebase is generally very defensive, but like every browser, our JavaScript engine is slightly le…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #41848565
Can confirm, am incredibly excited to talk browsers and discuss how they work! (Hi Pavel, love the book!)
- story
-
comment
Comment #41113549
Oliver (the main developer) just announced that they’re going to work full time on Porffor: https://x.com/canadahonk/status/1818347311417938237
- story
-
comment
Comment #40859215
Which part, the nonprofit or the permissively licensed codebase? ;)
-
comment
Comment #40859082
I’m still the BDFL but my role is evolving a bit as I’m now also running the nonprofit. We are definitely a stripped down operation, and we will spend as much of our funding as pos…
-
comment
Comment #40859029
We’re always open to new developers! Find a website that doesn’t work right, then try to figure out why, and see if you can fix it :) The best for a beginner is usually to start wi…
-
comment
Comment #40857380
Please don't trust random distro packages of Ladybird, we have no idea what they're packaging, but it's unlikely to be current, and not something we can help you with. I wish distr…
-
comment
Comment #40856243
We will absolutely have the ability to block ads. The web is downright unpleasant without this feature!
-
comment
Comment #40856226
Yes! I'm already working on it full time, along with 3 employees. In the next month, we are bringing on 3 more. Given the limitations of our funding model, we won't be building a h…
-
comment
Comment #40856099
Yes, our next language will be a memory safe one.
-
comment
Comment #40856048
We've committed to this in our application for tax-exempt status, so it's something the organization will be stuck with. :)
-
comment
Comment #40856021
> What do you think is going to be the first milestone where Ladybird is going to be able to be a real alternative (even if limited to certain use cases) and in what timeframe do y…
-
comment
Comment #40855860
These days, all major browsers are taking interoperability very seriously. There’s even efforts like the annual “Interop 202x” where people vote on which interop bugs browsers shou…
-
comment
Comment #40855665
That was a long time ago indeed! To be honest, I think I was partly saying that because I was scared of the idea of supporting the entire web platform. It seemed so far away at the…
-
comment
Comment #40855623
1. We are not focusing on legacy hardware support. Given our release date is far in the future, we are mainly targeting the kind of devices most people will have a few years from n…
-
comment
Comment #40855579
There are a ton of standards at a glance, but when you look closer, you realize that much of it isn't implemented by other browsers either, and you only need a fraction of it to re…
-
comment
Comment #40855546
With a simple two-part strategy: 1. We keep the team small enough that there's always at least 1.5 years of runway in the bank. 2. We continue fundraising actively.
-
comment
Comment #40855514
We have not been debating this publicly as it has a 100% chance of devolving into a bikeshed discussion :)
-
comment
Comment #40855435
Yes, we are aware of how permissive licenses work. If someone forks our code and does a better job with it than we do, fair game. :)