Viewing profile — avsteele
avsteele
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 05, 2017, 12:05 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,689
- Public activity
- 353 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About avsteele
adam@zerok.com
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48668018
What does this have to do with Alibaba? Are you saying Alibaba is the reseller? If not it sounds like you are describing a separate phenomenon.
-
comment
Comment #47922293
It is even worse than the article says. You can, though these dialogs, wind up having folder on your hard drive moved around, have your desktop or other folders which you do not in…
-
comment
Comment #46706930
Obviously ~nobody has read this yet... But I did have a question based on the opening: "If you wanted to create a tool that would enable the destruction of institutions that prop u…
-
comment
Comment #46680858
I haven't had much success yet with this. My ratings follow. Reading and interpreting datasheets: A- (this has gotten a LOT better in the last year) Give netlist to LLM and ask it …
-
comment
Comment #46641008
Lots of this is right, but > and PRC's was to peak emissions by 2030s This appears to be wrong. Peak is supposed to be before 2030. They will not hit it. https://climateactiontrack…
-
comment
Comment #46633438
This is not energy output (production, usage), it is that plus an adjustment for the in->out energy efficiency. It would only == production if all energy sources in the mix has the…
-
comment
Comment #46632115
That metric doesn't answer the same question. It isn't saying 18% of their needs are being met by renewables.
-
comment
Comment #46631682
Beautiful pictures. To be clear: China runs on coal and will for the foreseeable future. https://www.iea.org/countries/china https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/coal-consumption-by-…
-
comment
Comment #46325126
If you want a consequentialist answer: If, for ethical reasons, fewer people were willing to take these jobs, then either salaries would have to rise or the work would be done less…
-
comment
Comment #46194212
> Article Context-free raw #'s "Dollar General stores have failed more than 4,300 government price-accuracy inspections in 23 states since January 2022" Is this a lot or a little? …
-
comment
Comment #46191718
Article Context-free raw #'s, no comparisons to traditional grocery stores AFAIK. Dad journalism. You should not update on this article unless you have some outside knowledge of th…
-
comment
Comment #46147172
Why is this worth doing? What wrong with the status quo? The author does not give any examples of Oracle threatening people for using the JavaScript (tm) name.
-
comment
Comment #45332134
Interesting line to draw: - you can record all manner of video in your store... - but you can't process it in this particular way.
-
comment
Comment #45260886
The authors largest bullet point is on author identification. What are the arguments against this and do people really feel they outweigh the benefits? My view: I would think given…
-
comment
Comment #44279158
Malpractice slightly hyperbolic. But anybody relying on Gary's posts in order to be be informed on this subject is being being mislead. This isn't an isolated incident either. Peop…
-
comment
Comment #44278868
Papers make specific conclusions based on specific data. The paper I linked specifically rebuts the conclusions of the paper. Gary makes vague statements that could be interpreted …
-
comment
Comment #44278792
This doesn't rebut anything from the best critique of the Apple paper. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09250
-
comment
Comment #44218380
Many people drive places other (further) than work multiple times a year. "75 mile battery" wouldn't even be good enough for a one-way trip of this kind let alone there and back ag…
-
comment
Comment #44217419
The authors don't say anything like this that I can see. Their conclusion specifically identifies these as weaknesses of current frontier models. Furthermore we have clearly seen i…
-
comment
Comment #44217256
People are drawing erroneous conclusions from this. My read of this is that the paper demonstrates that given a particular model (and the problems examined with it) that giving mor…
-
comment
Comment #44205579
This is about way more than software. It's all R&D It's effectively 6 years too. You only get to depreciate 10% in 1st year. This might have killed my company if it was around duri…
-
comment
Comment #44205525
That isn't the reason. They sunset in the bill so it has a lower CBO score (which calculates costs out to 10 years). If you sunset in the bill after 5 years, even if you know it wi…
-
comment
Comment #44175548
NOT in professional communication. If you want to run your lab that way, feel free.
-
comment
Comment #44175544
We have certain professional communications standards in the scientific community. This isn't a corner bar.
-
comment
Comment #44175363
Profanity should not be in the title of scientific articles. Most unprofessional. In addition, titling your article for shock value should be discouraged. The end point will be a d…