Viewing profile — avisaven

I actually used this as inspiration for a little self-challenge to write a programming language in 24hrs not too long ago [1]. I didn't get quite as far as I'd've liked to, but non…

A similar but more structured (though perhaps Hound supports a similar feature set) code searching tool is OpenGrok [1]. It's a bit more setup as it uses Apache Tomcat, but once it…

If you find WiFi-based attacks on devices to be interesting, you may be interested in the following research from Google Project Zero on attacking the iPhone’s WiFi stack (and link…

If you want to play with RISC-V hardware right now, I highly recommend taking a look at the Sipeed MAIX [1]. It has a bunch of neat features along with a dedicated RISC-V processor…

I had been looking for this exact project, but I couldn't remember its name for the longest time. But I remember that home page exactly. Doing a bit of seraching it turns out volt.…

What a coincidense, for my high school senior project in 2017 I built an operating system as well [1] (which I still work on to this day). For anyone who is put off by the difficul…

That's odd, I'm running on a Macbook with an Intel Iris Pro integrated graphics card and I'm getting 60FPS. Using Chromium 62.0.3202.89 (Developer Build) (64-bit) though. https://i…

I'd love to talk about cryptocurrencies/software engineering/cybersecurity if you're interested. avi . saven (at) gmail

This is a real shame. I had used Skype for Linux as part of a research project creating a Tor Bridge that used QR codes in a video stream to send the Tor data. It had a pretty dece…

Out of curiosity, why would something like this be closed off to people < 18 y/o?

I've recently been playing around with HackerOne. It's a great way to both benefit society (by finding, reporting, and eliminating security flaws in software that people rely on) a…

A very common methodology is using a technique called fuzzing. There exists many fuzzers which have produced great success finding a plethora of both non-exploitable and exploitabl…

I thought of the same thing. I have a feeling it's not the same organization however because when Cicada 3301 refers to themselves, they use 3301 rather than Cicada.