Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — averell

averell

HN member
Joined
Sat, Sep 13, 2014, 4:11 PM UTC
HN karma
45
Public activity
14 items

About averell

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #31265667

    This discussion is already dead, but for posterity: The real motivation was actually a performance improvement, as can be seen at https://github.com/golang/go/commit/55c458e05f35d0…

  2. comment
    Comment #19788283

    I don't think that is true anymore: https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-spot-530-000-potenti...

  3. comment
    Comment #18920104

    And Wiley / ProjectDEAL just yesterday reached a breakthrough: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/01/groundbreaking-deal-m... Suprisingly little coverage, but things aren't lookin…

  4. comment
    Comment #15416407

    I just don't think it's likely that the real reason most software is crappy, is because nobody thought of extending unit test coverage yet. Selling tools here is not "the other way…

  5. comment
    Comment #15415897

    It's hard to build your consultant image by telling people that multiple methods and tools might work. It's easier to market a simple cure. Also, the point to "stop making shitty s…

  6. comment
    Comment #15377165

    It's just numbers of letters in the alphabet, e.g. 0615180523151804 == "foreword"

  7. comment
    Comment #14333938

    They certainly are going above and beyond. It's basically impossible to find a good VPN that works with Netflix, and they also block pretty much every IP range where you can get a …

  8. comment
    Comment #13446727

    No, the article states the method will correctly remove the mentioned whitespace characters even from UTF-8 text, because they are part of the 7 bit subset this method works on.

  9. comment
    Comment #13281099

    That is very much possible in many cases. Zero cost abstractions exist: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2015/05/11/traits.html

  10. comment
    Comment #13023748

    Actually they just killed that program, and you won't be able to log via certificates starting early next year.

  11. comment
    Comment #12894266

    Not a lot of mention of AI for CS, even in 2002. What about (2080+, P/=NP, proof techniques completely opaque to humans). And by that I don't mean mechanical exclusion of special c…

  12. comment
    Comment #9139212

    >The people yelling at you are trying desperately to pretend like it was easy so they don’t feel like an idiot for how long it took them to figure things out. This in turn makes yo…

  13. comment
    Comment #9030437

    Not yet - gcc (GCC) 4.9.2 20150204 (prerelease) But the article reasoning of having to stick it out for a long time doesn't apply anyway when you have a rolling release.

  14. comment
    Comment #8495207

    If that would disqualify then so would feeling good about it without telling people, it's the same kind of compensation. And he could even tell people the same thing without really…