Viewing profile — austinjp
austinjp
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Apr 20, 2014, 5:49 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,953
- Public activity
- 1,328 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About austinjp
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48164475
Find people in her field who are already hopping on the wave. Better still, gently persuade her to find those people. She'll probably know where to look. In fact, I'd be surprised …
-
comment
Comment #48031039
So... ummm... the website and all the submitter's comments here seem very Claude generated, no? Spam filters are going to have to get a lot more sophisticated. "Slop" filters, even…
-
comment
Comment #47883087
I'm unsure of how this information is being presented. But it's entirely possible for the majority of people on Earth to avoid all those things. And it's entirely possible for many…
-
comment
Comment #47703323
> It's already illegal to threaten journalists [in] America Not necessarily, it depends on the pressure and the intent. > In America we generally make bad things illegal, not activ…
-
comment
Comment #47701156
Polymarket gamblers have pressured at least one journalist regarding reporting of missile strikes. This requires regulation or, as others here have suggested, non-anonymity, maybe …
-
comment
Comment #47700881
A crossword puzzle generator, just for fun. Grid generator in Python because it's easy to hack around and grid generation doesn't need to be particularly fast. Go for populating th…
-
comment
Comment #47687085
It very much depends on the crime. The truly awful stuff is committed by intelligent people.
-
comment
Comment #47687023
And there's always a product provider who's willing to add that flag, despite all the warnings.
-
comment
Comment #47611988
To save people the digging, here's the git repo: https://github.com/dmtrKovalenko/fff.nvim "FFF stands for freakin fast fuzzy file finder (pick 3) and it is an opinionated fuzzy fi…
-
comment
Comment #47608863
Kudos for listing the things you're *not* willing to work on, and for those things in particular.
-
comment
Comment #47584529
Erm.... you're not exactly proving them wrong are you.
-
comment
Comment #47584211
I feel this sneaking up on me. I've only recently allowed Claude to actually edit some files directly, rather than just show me suggested edits. It could certainly be addictive to …
-
comment
Comment #47584139
> rapidly leading to task paralysis with the sheer scale of the plan. Yikes. I feel seen .
-
comment
Comment #47562075
So let's say there's a causative link (see other comments here for why this may not be the case), it would take a lifetime of daily complex spatial navigation for several hours eve…
-
comment
Comment #47525777
Oh I'm sure the grifters will find ways in. The other disciplines may have provided a "moat" for the past few decades, but it won't last forever.
-
comment
Comment #47515581
I'm not so sure. It's definitely the de facto standard, but I suspect minimal HTML is better. Just enough tags to add structure and meaning (H1-H6, p, a, em, section for structure …
-
comment
Comment #47515532
Yep both are widely used. I forget which markdowns extensions they originated from. The Pandoc website probably has the details.
-
comment
Comment #47515521
It uses MJML under the hood. https://mjml.io/
-
comment
Comment #47500225
Whether you can or can't in reality is moot, unfortunately. The literature search in biomedical fields should indeed be theoretically reproducible. I don't know about other fields,…
-
comment
Comment #47500201
Quite probably there are differences between fields. In biomedical literature reviews the search terms and databases are detailed, and (in systematic reviews) a PRISMA flowchart [0…
-
comment
Comment #47497552
While your dashboard sounds fancy, this part raises issues: > I run ChatGPT Pro to collect all relevant papers Any literature review must be reproducible. If you can't say exactly …
-
comment
Comment #47476823
Triple, according to Wikipedia.
-
comment
Comment #47473191
Well, how about you lower your head below your hand and twist your neck to bring your mouth level with the chopsticks?
-
comment
Comment #47448232
Note the "/s" at the end of their post, indicating sarcasm.
- comment