Viewing profile — aumerle
aumerle
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Mar 26, 2016, 5:26 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 569
- Public activity
- 213 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About aumerle
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42568789
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42567224
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42566298
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42565819
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42565534
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42564827
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42564663
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42564532
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42564500
Of course, I didn't mean to put you in a spot. We can always continue this later once your thoughts have matured. Sadly I have an extremely full schedule so I dont think I have the…
-
comment
Comment #42564462
So if I am to understand your proposal more concretely it is something like implement an escape code that the shell can use to turn off all other escape codes (presumably with some…
-
comment
Comment #42564440
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42564380
Yup kitty revolutionized my terminal experience, hence the passion. I am sorry but since you seem to be passionate enough about ghostty to try to shill it in a article about a secu…
-
comment
Comment #42564352
You proposal does not address this issue since shells would still need full privileges. This entire class of exploits (query responses with user controlled data leading to shells e…
-
comment
Comment #42564292
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42295931
Yes, but this is two well known and understood functions we are talking about, wrapping them is really not that hard.
-
comment
Comment #42295308
It's not even slightly tricky, just use self pipe. I have no idea why the maintainer of make rejected it. He says select has different signatures, but select is in POSIX, so unless…
-
comment
Comment #42180636
Or run kitty --dump-commands program-whose-output-you-want-to-inspect You can even save the --dump-commands output as edit it and then replay it with kitty --dump-commands program …
-
comment
Comment #42041796
Ah yes, in that case there no terminals that implement it indeed. Though there are a few that implement changing window size via escape code, though in units of cells not pixels. G…
-
comment
Comment #42041530
Lots of modern terminals support ws_xpixel and ws_ypixel. Hell even the venerable xterm supports it. It is used primarily for displaying raster graphics in modern terminals, see fo…
-
comment
Comment #41522920
And we are all delighted to be spared from your personality in the kitty community. Enjoy your day as well.
-
comment
Comment #41522811
Then stick to commenting on posts about such software instead of trying to mislead people about software you know nothing about.
-
comment
Comment #41522713
Sigh. Go read the docs: remote control has both a socket only mode, and has the ability to allow tty connections only with a password: https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/conf/#opt-kit…
-
comment
Comment #41522639
Nope, native applications are not ever going to get the ridiculous level of sandboxing demonstrated by the restrictions on accessing the clipboard in the article. Nor are they ever…
-
comment
Comment #41514491
Again, no non mobile OS prevents native applications from using the clipboard as it should be used. And none of them show any signs of changing that.
-
comment
Comment #41512297
And that's just what he did until someone showed up to do the grunt work of porting to Python 3, at which point he co-operated with that person and helped make the port happen, jus…