Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — augustk

augustk

HN member
Joined
Mon, May 20, 2013, 11:38 AM UTC
HN karma
658
Public activity
337 items

About augustk

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49003022

    "Accept everything"

  2. comment
    Comment #48035843

    Turning off Javascript made the dot go away.

  3. comment
    Comment #47845565

    That sounds like shoulder pain.

  4. comment
    Comment #47762640

    The hospital information system Millenium from Oracle was bought by two regions in south of Sweden for around 400 million USD. It turned out to be unusable for Swedish healthcare a…

  5. comment
    Comment #47753952

    And knowing how to get the version of an application (which used to be in Help -> About).

  6. comment
    Comment #47753881

    For group chats in Microsoft Teams with more than seven participants, if you click on "View and add participants" (an icon with two people and a plus sign) you see a list of seven …

  7. comment
    Comment #47753392

    Then it turns out that the book was written by an LLM.

  8. comment
    Comment #47751585

    Why don't we instead focus our energies on the user . For some very important software applications the customer is not the user. Let the sales department focus on the customer.

  9. comment
    Comment #47677472

    Isn't the manufacturer to blame if I get neck problems then?

  10. comment
    Comment #47676459

    Something that would be useful in my case is a monitor stand stand. Does anyone know why almost no current monitor can be raised so that the upper edge is at eye level? Is it due t…

  11. comment
    Comment #47571936

    Postconditions are in conflict with programmers' love of early returns.

  12. comment
    Comment #47249562

    The argument in the article was that the for loop is (potentially) "lying" and that is still true in my example. Niklaus Wirth's Modula-2 had a LOOP statement in which an EXIT stat…

  13. comment
    Comment #47246806

    It's also worth noting that statements like for (i = 1; i are just as bad since `break' (and `continue' and early `return') are a just gotos in disguise.

  14. comment
    Comment #47172350

    "universal access to a large universe of documents" It's a sad fact that a large part of the web doesn't work without Javascript, a technology which enables privacy-invasive practi…

  15. comment
    Comment #46919549

    With so many ready meals to choose from I don't understand why anyone nowadays would cook anything from scratch.

  16. comment
    Comment #46586229

    Should be easy to correct the default behavior for the next release if the issue is reported.

  17. comment
    Comment #46431669

    It's also worth noting that a customer is not necessarily a user. As a developer I don't care so much about the customer but I care wholeheartedly about the users.

  18. comment
    Comment #46421658

    In the best scenario the developers are also active users of the software they produce. Then a design flaw or an error that affects the users will also affect the developers and wi…

  19. comment
    Comment #46410369

    Progressive enhancement is the way to go if you care about technical excellence. For some reason it fell out of fashion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement

  20. comment
    Comment #46395134

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reservoir_sampling

  21. comment
    Comment #46367910

    And also bring back progressive enhancement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement

  22. comment
    Comment #46301713

    Or create the family

  23. comment
    Comment #45715872

    If the input parameters are invalid there is an error in the program so it makes more sense to use the assert function. Why would you need to undo something due to the restriction …

  24. comment
    Comment #45703367

    Better stick to a single point of exit. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20311080

  25. comment
    Comment #45398605

    Then there is the joy of making the program source code as easy as possible to comprehend. This motivation seems to be rather unusual among programmers unfortunately.