Viewing profile — auggierose

Not sure what your comment has anything to do with my comment, or the comment I replied to. But to answer to your comment: Opus 5 says that Nielsen's critique is nonsense.

Opus 5 says the disproof is wrong.

That's different though. Understanding the spec of Fermat's last theorem is simple. Here, you already need to know some mathematics just to understand the spec.

Because it is more efficient, of course. Same reason why I use Codex/Claude Code for programming, and not only the chat window.

That's fine. This is a statement about yourself, not me.

[flagged]

I am pretty sure you cannot send 1000 high value AI generated emails.

No, something truly better does not exist yet, but that doesn't mean that it won't. Lean is young compared to Isabelle or Rocq, but actually quite old in absolut terms (and especia…

Or we just don't use LEAN but something better.

Which is still a case of the spec being simpler than the implementation (you are after) ;-) Very often, the spec is indeed just a very simple implementation. Often you can make the…

I wouldn’t split it like that. Formal verification is useful in the case that the spec is simpler than the implementation. That’s it. Coming up with simple specs is not necessarily…

> I'd say a preeminently foolish bet by the time the vaccine was actually available. A preeminently foolish bet is to use a vaccine where you don't know anything about medium or lo…

There is nothing ambiguous about my sentence. Once you learnt thinking, read it again.

> Are you arguing against the existence of an objective reality? Seems a little extreme. No, I am not arguing against the existence of an objective reality. I argue against the cap…

[flagged]

Young people are actually right then in never ever taking any vaccine recommended by public policy ever again. If taking a vaccine is against your personal interest, and neverthele…

Every "fact" you state really includes the opinion that the "fact" is indeed a fact. Is climate change man-made?

The truth very much exists, see Gödel's theorems. People get confused by this created/discovered thing. Of course it is discovered. It was there even before you created it. ;-)

I get where you are coming from (it's me, last year), and that's what I thought. But if you use Claude Code or Codex, you will blow through your pro plan quickly. If you don't use …

What is a "normal" subscription? Are you using Claude Code, or just Claude??

> Schmidhuber's continual reminding everyone that he was working on neural nets back in the 1990s is beyond tiresome. Yes, he should have been recognized alongside Hinton/Bengio/Le…

Good one. See, we did make some serious progress, all you AI haters.

The truth is out there!

Let's not pretend like research funding was money well spent before Trump. It wasn't. If tax payers actually knew how research funding works in practice, they wouldn't want any of …