Viewing profile — atsider

Yep, to me it's not far superior to find-replace: https://nullprogram.com/blog/2017/09/07/

I think there is nothing to prove, I set up my prosody just by reading the documentation -- eventually https://compliance.conversations.im/ is a great tool to see how well you are …

wrt to old crusty FORTRAN code: scipy is using many of those popular libraries, it is based on them. wrt to type signatures, many of those ancient FORTRAN libraries are written wit…

Yep, it combines the convenience of a GUI, the scripting capabilities and the power of the key shortcuts. It's almost perfect!

I'm using Debian's 78.5.0. It uses external gpg by default and works flawlessly for me with my hardware USB token.

This us a great addon I discovered recently, but nevertheless they have an introductory video about the Blender editor: https://github.com/GDQuest/blender-power-sequencer/blob/1.5.…

And yet none of those technologies is fortran-specific, nor mentioned on its standard, nor solve at tiny bit the problems the OP was specifying.

But then we are not talking about fortran anymore: I tried recently PGI and it is far behind than intel/gfortran with respect to the standard. I can code with CUDA in many more lan…

Exactly, that is my point: so we are mainly still in the land of Fortran95, which is not designed for taking advantage of the latest features of the hardware.

Nowadays intel is not a reference for C++; the versions found on HPC compilers are not the fastest nor the best following the latest standards. I don't think commercial/open source…