Viewing profile — atanasovskib
atanasovskib
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Dec 05, 2018, 9:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 25
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About atanasovskib
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39911188
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #31203575
I guess for now you shouldn't worry unless you plan to join/co-found an extra-early stage startup
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #27144499
So 7?
-
comment
Comment #26369717
There are a lot of differences that need to be taken into account before making a comparison. 1. TimescaleDB implements the compression on a hifher level, the underlying table stor…
-
comment
Comment #25288327
In my opinion it would be very hard to justify using Timestream for any analysis heavy workloads for at least three reasons: 1. Queries will need to touch a lot of data - will cost…
-
comment
Comment #25288211
The blog post links to a comparison done by the CrateDB folks ( https://crate.io/a/amazon-timestream-first-impressions/ )
-
comment
Comment #25072368
I would suggest checking out other smaller cloud providers for managed databases over Aurora. Check out Aiven.io
-
comment
Comment #23274853
I replied to the parent comment. In short yes, it is supported ( https://docs.timescale.com/latest/using-timescaledb/continuo... )
-
comment
Comment #23274840
I think what you are referring to is the TimescaleDB real-time aggregates https://docs.timescale.com/latest/using-timescaledb/continuo... It allows you to define aggregations that …
-
comment
Comment #23274056
The Hypertables and Distributed Hypertables can be used to store any kind of data, but works best as long as it has a monotonously increasing partitioning key (e.g. time), with hig…