Viewing profile — asudhakar11

It should be able to tell you what assumptions it made. “Sales is $X because I assumed ARR and calendar year”. You’re then able to say great that’s what I wanted or “no I want book…

Why weren’t you able to show usable insights from data?

Huddl.ai | Backend Engineer | US | SF Bay Area | FULL-TIME | ONSITE Huddl.ai founded by ex-Cisco Webex and Sun engineers, backed by Bain, Bloomberg and Propel, is building product …

Possible to have small bad communities no? I'd argue % of bad actors (vs size) is the tipping metric. Also smaller communities like HN probably have a larger % of bad actors (small…

thanks @vikrampatel. Pulling the data from a few places. The concept graphs are w2v and Wikipedia. The funding data is from sources like the NSF (I capture 90% of the $60bn of annu…

Thanks @fasicle. That's a great idea and I'll work on it asap. Some limitations will be English speaking countries (my own limitation!) and data availability, but I'll look into it…

Thanks @kyunbit! I'll point you to a cleaned up front end soon :)

oops, looks like I linked to a test URL: here's a more reliable one! http://159.203.189.96/dojobs?mode=json&center=&summary=dna%2...

Valid question @chinjoshi. Our funding data's pulled from sources like the NSF. These account for 90% of the $60bn of annual research spend in the US. Our patent data is pulled dir…

@ericsun, sure, I use a combination of W2v and Wikipedia for the concepts. I then query a repository that I assemble (funding, papers and patent data).

@franklee2, sure. just change the text after the = sign. It needs some work, but you'll get an overall idea of who's doing significant work in the topic! It's a summary of funding,…

Reddit AMA by Columbia CS prof on 3/6 at 10.30a PST on DNA computers. The link shows you who else has done work in the topic (needs better UI!). What do you think?