Viewing profile — astro123
astro123
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 01, 2019, 7:41 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 379
- Public activity
- 44 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About astro123
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #30618691
Measurements of pretty much any time in the universe can test predictions made by models of the early universe. One of the main reasons we think there was inflation is from late ti…
-
comment
Comment #30618176
Inflation happened during the first tiniest fractions of a second post big bang. No telescope is going to make direct observations of the inflationary period so I'm not sure what y…
-
comment
Comment #29345993
I worked with someone (this is in astronomy) who said that papers in nature were the most likely to be wrong. They are in nature because they have a dramatic (new/unexpected) resul…
-
comment
Comment #27262590
Small stars live a very long time. A star of the mass of our sun has a lifespan of ~10 billion years which gets you almost back to the beginning of the universe (~13 billion). This…
-
comment
Comment #27261733
That's a weird distinction to try to make. Metal does mean the elements, not the spectral lines. The presence of those elements is usually inferred from the spectral lines, but if …
-
comment
Comment #26501448
> It seems significant that the lens galaxy has little dark matter I don't see that in the article? They centered on galaxy clusters which contain huge amounts of dark matter. DM i…
-
comment
Comment #26248383
I think it was taken at a particular time. If it were the closest, venus would be closer than the sun. Skimming the paper it looks like it was the positions in Aug 2003
-
comment
Comment #26248347
The early universe's expansion was not accelerating, as the early universe was not dominated by dark energy. I don't know off the top of my head exactly when that changed, but z=0.…
-
comment
Comment #26075578
There's no strong lensing there. If the background galaxies were lensed enough to have multiple images they would also be incredibly distorted. But that does look like a small grou…
-
comment
Comment #25498276
Eek! I guess I'm more OK with this now...
-
comment
Comment #25497880
The best suggestion I have is https://astrobites.org/ These are paper summaries, written by people in the field, where you are probably the target audience. I don't read it myself,…
-
comment
Comment #25497838
Yup, by fringe I meant "On the edge of what reasonable people are working on". But maybe it's not a great term if people misunderstand.
-
comment
Comment #25497809
That's a fair point. I love reading computer hardware rumours, most of which are probably total garbage (and probably obviously so to anyone in the field). And in this case, whethe…
-
comment
Comment #25497522
No-one is making an argument by authority. Here is a nice popular article that outlines some of the issues with MOND https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/03/06/only...…
-
comment
Comment #25497439
The astrophysics journal (ApJ) is a really good journal. A majority of good astronomy papers are published in ApJ or in MNRAS. Big things go in Nature/Science + then there are othe…
-
comment
Comment #25497237
I only skimmed the paper past the abstract, but for what it is worth. The MOND favouring group is a fringe of the cosmology community. The vast majority feel that there is enough e…
-
comment
Comment #24957516
I'm not suggesting that at all! I'm just saying it took 30 odd years to take off/break out of the nuclear physics world. Though rereading my first comment that wasn't entirely clea…
-
comment
Comment #24956694
Kringing is the same thing as gaussian process regression, and astronomers use GPs a fair bit. I'm not sure whether they are used more widely. My favourite forgotten/isolated stati…
-
comment
Comment #24949134
I didn't know about that, that's really cool! Thanks for letting me know.
-
comment
Comment #24944775
I don't think that is right, though I'm not a GW expert so please tell me if I'm wrong. I think they know the difference just by looking at the mass. i.e. we think it is hard to fo…
-
comment
Comment #24944701
That's an interesting question. I've never thought about it or seen that taken into account (its not something we fit to when constraining cosmology) I just looked around and LIGO …
-
comment
Comment #23736786
I highly recommend these books by Alan Hirshfeld [1][2]. The first is about the discovery of parallax, and the instrument that was used to do this in 1838 was built by Fraunhofer. …
-
comment
Comment #23093982
We have! A constraint on dark matter is that it needs to be around at very early times. Before the time of the CMB (400 000 years after the Big Bang). If there wasn't dark matter a…
-
comment
Comment #23011967
While yes, better launch capability == cheaper to put telescopes in orbit == good for astronomy, its not that simple. Interferometry is HARD. The Keck telescopes which sit 100m apa…
-
comment
Comment #22863763
The argument is actually really really simple. If it started from within the solar system, it would not (barring some three body interaction) have enough energy to escape. But, we …