Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — asterius

asterius

HN member
Joined
Tue, Dec 19, 2017, 11:52 AM UTC
HN karma
58
Public activity
26 items

About asterius

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #16800795

    There is some interesting Q&A at the end of Pascal's talk. My schoolboy French is not fast enough to do a proper translation unfortunately. He was asked about parallel (software) d…

  2. comment
    Comment #16572631

    I'm not sure how battle hardened Mastodon is, obviously they don't have the resources of Twitter or Facebook. Probably easy to DDOS an individual server. However, it might be possi…

  3. comment
    Comment #16567984

    Oblique to the predictable Slack XMPP decision, but relevant to federation: Mastondon is a facinating federated social network. It addresses the identity/reputation issues without …

  4. comment
    Comment #16521356

    Doh, you're right. I looked at the site earlier and forgot to click on the red triangle and click "re-enable warnings". Mea culpa. I checked firefox and it works correctly too.

  5. comment
    Comment #16517903

    Unlikely to be extradited for an extra-territorial claim. But the members of the executive and the board might not want to strike Germany from their list of travel destinations for…

  6. comment
    Comment #16517887

    I tested going to a https link via gmail. On desktop chrome, it immediately opens the link (and hence passes the link parameters). On mobile it pops up a privacy error, "Attackers …

  7. comment
    Comment #16517858

    It seems grandiose to call that 'certificate pinning' when it is just hard coding, e.g. a self-signed CA cert or (worse) a particular server cert. Makes me suspect that a lot of cl…

  8. comment
    Comment #16517645

    Certificate pinning is going away: http://www.zdnet.com/article/google-chrome-is-backing-away-f... I think we can be confident that sites that don't even use CSP won't be implement…

  9. comment
    Comment #16517627

    If you look at https://track.emirates.email you will see that it isn't emirates either, but a service provided by Mandrill, an add-on for MailChimp, and the cert is valid for https…

  10. comment
    Comment #16445869

    @minimaxir for your list: - Not possible to downvote some posters, as the authors have extreme karma (e.g. >10,000, though I don't know the exact number), even if you have >>500 ka…

  11. comment
    Comment #16419197

    You know you can get a support contract right? Where you pay the experts at Qt and they help you?

  12. comment
    Comment #16418989

    Maybe this was the case with Qt4, but Qt5 (that is, QML) is a dream.

  13. comment
    Comment #16398833

    You really think the memo was "starting a meaningful conversation"? Did you even read it?

  14. comment
    Comment #16398818

    That memo was never intended to remain private correspondance. And I'd hope that Google would have terminated his employment in any case.

  15. comment
    Comment #16352133

    They might not have paid for a source code licence. or they did, but they never made sure they had a copy, just left it with the developer. Surprsingly common for companies to get …

  16. comment
    Comment #16343958

    The real benefit from this work is not exfiltrating from airgapped computers, but from code running inside Intel SGX or similar isolated computation modes.

  17. comment
    Comment #16323905

    Projector fiddling has been replaced with VTC fiddling. I hate Polycom/Skype with a far greater passion than any printer.

  18. comment
    Comment #16245786

    There is no particular reason to expect that qemu has any greater security that vbox. All of these systems have a significant amount of very critical code; I particularly sceptical…

  19. comment
    Comment #16197751

    The investors didn't want standard returns, the valuation was based on them growing rapidly for years, which means new markets. They could have made money from their drone product …

  20. comment
    Comment #16197578

    No one who cares about latency even has 10GBASE-T hardware, because it introduces a vast amount of coding latency. It is also very power inefficient.

  21. comment
    Comment #16132004

    Well, Colin Furze can make it in his garage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soxxPyaAT1k

  22. comment
    Comment #16124646

    As well as being higher pitched, contra-rotating designs also produce more noise. The sound field is non-uniform (mostly axial), and there are claims of being able to reduce it thr…

  23. comment
    Comment #16124534

    All that is missing is mention of blockchain.

  24. comment
    Comment #16124511

    You are correct, much better lift, speed, economy from a single large slower moving rotor (or a pair of counter-rotating blades, cost/benefits described in other posts). The reason…

  25. comment
    Comment #16124249

    I'm almost sure this is a champion satirical comment.