Viewing profile — asdsa5325

He was supported by his family. I'm sure you understand that receiving support doesn't make mental illness disappear. And in the US, no one can force him to take meds unless it's p…

But if you are part-time, then you don't get employment benefits.

I'd happily spend $2300 on a computer- but not a macbook. $2300 will get you far more power and quality.

Take a laptop with a good trackpad and install macOS on it?

> build quality Hasn't macbooks been plagued with keyboard issues? > good support Limited support from 3rd parties is good?

It has never been powerful compared to the price.

Not sure why you are getting downvoted, you are right. A mac is a status symbol. If you wanted a good system, you could get far more than a mac can give with the same price.

Why the hell did you pay 2300 for one in 2014? That's so overpriced it's kind of sad that they have Apple fanboys in their grasp so much.

Sorry sir- I didn't mean to insult the Great State of YC. Hopefully my social credit won't go down too much. /s

This is exactly Musk's behavior. He does shit like this on Twitter all the time.

It would be an easy suit. Especially since musk doubled down in a second tweet, saying he has evidence...

Microsoft Office Lens

Yes- but if you make the part that is legally the gun yourself, it's fine. Anyone is allowed to manufacture a gun, as long as they don't sell it. If you want to sell it, you'd need…

What was wrong with my comment? It's valid criticism of HN readers; it's perfectly substantive.

I doubt it. I'm a young guy with lots of gamer friends, and none of us are remotely interested in VR. It's clunky and unintuitive at the moment. Business orders are likely driving …

Your logic is "white men have some privileges, therefore white men have absolutely no prejudice against them and absolutely no problems in society". This is sexist, racist, bad log…

If it contains the word "Rust" I automatically upvote - every HN reader, apparently

I'm not saying the odds are high. I'm just saying it is in fact possible.

> Weapons in space are very expensive No, they just took a normal weapon and mounted it. > dangerous. And they can be easily destroyed Literally all mounted weapons can be describe…

This is absolutely incorrect.

They had a aircraft cannon attached to the Salyut 3 in 1974. No longer active of course. I'm just pointing out that other countries are not afraid of weaponizing space- we are simp…

Because it's a typo. China spend $101 Billion on all research in 2015. A small portion of that was more quantum physics. WSJ issued a correction, as noted in a different comment in…

Russia had weapons in space decades ago. We are behind

> the author is under the impression that it's still possible to go from working the register to CEO. Unlikely? Of course, but definitely possible.

Or better yet, just remove the post because it is incredibly low quality.