Viewing profile — asdf_
asdf_
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 17, 2017, 10:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 20
- Public activity
- 7 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About asdf_
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14368559
Sure, no argument there. For Google, producing and using TPUs, is probably cheaper than buying nvidia hardware.
-
comment
Comment #14367078
The interconnect hardware is present on the dgx-1 board. The point of my previous comment is that it doesn't make sense to compare an entire TPU module (containing 4x TPUs) to a V1…
-
comment
Comment #14364441
A single V100 board is vastly smaller than a TPU module with 4 TPU chips. The closest comparison in terms of size would be 1 Volta DGX-1 (8x V100s) compared to 2 TPU modules (8x TP…
-
comment
Comment #14364432
A single V100 board is vastly smaller than a TPU module with 4 TPU chips. The closest comparison in terms of size would be 1 Volta DGX-1 (8x V100s) compared to 2 TPU modules (8x TP…
-
comment
Comment #14363472
A single chip is only 45 TFLOPS. It is 180 TFLOPs per module (4x TPU chips): https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/05/googl...
-
comment
Comment #14363337
Google's 180 teraflop number is for a module, which contains 4 TPU chips. Meaning each TPU is 45 teraflops. See: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/05/googl...
-
comment
Comment #14363318
It is actually 45 teraflops per TPU2 chip and 180 teraflops for a module (4x chips): https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/05/googl... V100 is 120 teraflops of tensor…