Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — asdf-asdf-asdf

asdf-asdf-asdf

HN member
Joined
Sun, Oct 13, 2019, 8:32 AM UTC
HN karma
26
Public activity
20 items

About asdf-asdf-asdf

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #25383377

    it's unfortunate that the webpage is so misleading. for example, about email, it says: " Google and its partners have access to all your information and they can collect data, they…

  2. comment
    Comment #24745054

    it is really frustrating to read infinite variations of the comment "javascript development is too complicated", "it is much simpler in other languages" etc. yes, it is complicated…

  3. comment
    Comment #24333669

    nobody thinks that this behavior is good. the problem is, this is how it was at the beginning, and javascript will not break backwards compatibility. so we have to live with it (or…

  4. comment
    Comment #24333525

    unfortunately it's not possible to change the behavior because of backward compatibility. maybe we could have a `sort2()` method that works differently.

  5. comment
    Comment #23777421

    i'm glad it worked for the author, and i am sure you can achieve better performance with Rust than with NodeJS, but i'd like to discuss some of the mentioned advantages: in general…

  6. comment
    Comment #23425530

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22328856

  7. comment
    Comment #23245465

    in theory, yes. the problem is, how can chrome+firefox persuade microsoft, apple, debian and redhat to add it? and how long will that take? maybe some of them don't want it at all.…

  8. comment
    Comment #23112906

    i thought so to, but it's not like that. of you open that article: title: "Today’s Firefox Blocks Third-Party Tracking Cookies and Cryptomining by Default" from the text: "...will …

  9. comment
    Comment #22986818

    i was planning to try out Nix on MacOS, because i always wanted to try out Nix and i use MacOS, but then Catalina happened,a and suddenly there were problems with Nix on Catalina. …

  10. comment
    Comment #22986791

    so, what makes up the 19MB difference? (i assume it's not caused by the nix one being MUCH older :-) couldn't you simply do a multi-stage docker-image (in the not-nix situation),wh…

  11. comment
    Comment #22980399

    I don't think your description of Elixir and Phoenix is correct: Elixir is a language targeting the erlang virtual-machine. it does not seem clojure-inspired. Phoenix is a web deve…

  12. comment
    Comment #22890881

    it probably should be mentioned that the first github issue you linked is about signal loosing SMS-messages, not signal-messages. so for the case mentioned by the parent (" getting…

  13. comment
    Comment #22859548

    you can use NixOS on MacOS. i was planning to try it out (currently i use homebrew), but with Catalina it seems things are somewhat complicated for nixos+macos. my understanding is…

  14. comment
    Comment #22702289

    oh, i see what you mean. yes, i did somehow miss the "You can't build everything in safe Rust - certain things _require_ the use of unsafe." part of the argument. i did talk about …

  15. comment
    Comment #22701550

    exactly this. i understand that it's necessary to have raw/unsafe/whatever-is-the-name code when you interact with the outside world, or to implement building blocks of the languag…

  16. comment
    Comment #22701526

    sorry, what does "to optimize the balance of safety and speed with as few compromises as possible" mean? it's possible to cover many-many situations with that description.

  17. comment
    Comment #22701501

    i don't think i missed the point here. i wrote: "i do understand code using "unsafe" can be safe if the developer does not make mistakes. the problem is, developers do make mistake…

  18. comment
    Comment #22701055

    11 uses of "unsafe". (this is not a critique of this specific library, it's more a look at the rust ecosystem as a whole) i keep looking at Rust, but at the end it seems it is not …

  19. story
  20. comment
    Comment #21239240

    title is wrong, the spec is not ignored. spec says: " When an element’s autofill field name is "off", the user agent should not remember the control’s data, and should not offer pa…