Viewing profile — arnd
arnd
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 11:44 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 40
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About arnd
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27769948
No, it only means that Rockchips (or one of their customers) ships a kernel with a a driver for a Marvell wireless devices (presumably now made by NXP), for which Marvell claims to…
-
comment
Comment #27288078
M1 is Armv8.5-A, which is almost the same as Armv9.0-A, except that it lacks SVE2 vector instructions. Apple's CPUs tend to move to the latest architecture revision that is availab…
-
comment
Comment #26751399
Some of the Apple M1 changes went into the tty/serial driver tree that GregKH maintains. The actual platform code requires those changes, so we based the branch on top of that, and…
-
comment
Comment #26393867
MIPSr6, aarch64 and riscv are siblings born from MIPSr5 plus the best of other RISC architectures. ppc64le and 32-bit Arm are part of the wider family, but have some notable differ…
-
comment
Comment #26393652
They are using risc-v for their 64-bit cores now.
-
comment
Comment #26393564
Mips R6 (Warrior m62xx/i6400/i6500/p6600) was already somewhat incompatible with R5 and earlier, the seventh generation nanomips i7200 was incompatible with that again.
-
comment
Comment #26393450
The next "loongarch" generation was already announced to move away from mips as the underlying ISA but instead allow running mips, arm64, risc-v, and x86 code in hardware assisted …
-
comment
Comment #26249252
I double-checked the numbers reported by the driver against doing actual writes to the file system and the numbers reported by the OS, and they match exactly when there is no other…
-
comment
Comment #25486268
It was apparently built for a very specific use case (doing CI for some application) so I guess it has to be ARM Linux. You can run Linux in a VM guest on Mac mini, but some limita…
-
comment
Comment #25319378
User space doesn't generally deal well with time going backwards, but the main problem is that setting an absolute timeout in a program is broken when the target time is less than …
-
comment
Comment #25318657
I think you get into practical problems at some point. WikiChip lists a 28nm Cortex-A7 core at 0.48mm², with every node shrink (20nm, 14nm, 10nm, 7nm, ...) you can halve that, but …
-
comment
Comment #25314474
That sweet spot for cost has already moved from 40nm to 28nm for most of the market. The new SAM9X60 I mentioned is still on 40nm, but it's a tiny chip and all new Cortex-A7 SoCs a…
-
comment
Comment #25313612
I tried not to talk too much about 64-bit architectures, but that's a good point. Indeed not just Alpha but also MIPS R4000, UltraSPARC, PA-8000 were already around in the 1990s wh…
-
comment
Comment #25313278
musl has completed the move with version 1.2, and embedded distros are moving to that. glibc time64 support is still work in progress, as I wrote in the article
-
comment
Comment #22966943
32-bit Arm has some features that make it less RISC-like than others: - Predication as a major architectural feature -- every instruction can be conditionally executed - Complex lo…
-
comment
Comment #22966200
I find the latest architecture versions are all remarkably similar as they have all adapted to the same environment: The old 32-bit Arm (now called Aarch32) was quite different and…
-
comment
Comment #22965764
Ingenic an Loongson both have architecture licenses and so far have kept releasing new chips with their own cores on a regular basis, including (in Loongson's case) some interestin…