Viewing profile — aquaphile
aquaphile
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Dec 26, 2007, 5:45 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 292
- Public activity
- 104 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About aquaphile
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39542277
Finally! Now do the Blues (please, please DOJ and FTC). And the major inpatient and provider oligopolies. Market concentration across many layers is a huge reason we spend 17% of U…
-
comment
Comment #39542246
I would love to debate the conclusions with the McKinsey team. I think their analysis was highly flawed. Do Americans consume more healthcare? Yes. Is that the primary reason for o…
-
comment
Comment #38926773
Many DARPA projects over the years have approached similar X-65 design goals of increased flight control, modularity/redundancy. One of my favorites was Pulse Ejector Thrust Augmen…
-
comment
Comment #38468859
Yep. Gemalto was hot stuff for a while.
-
comment
Comment #38463028
Remember RSA and OPM? The RSA hack had huge implications for the Department of Defense, and was probably a state-sponsored hack (likely China). Around the same time the Office of P…
-
comment
Comment #38462975
Remember RSA and OPM? The RSA hack had huge implications for the Department of Defense, and was probably a state-sponsored hack (likely China). Around the same time the Office of P…
-
comment
Comment #38002644
Nokia is one of the top cellular/mobile backend hardware providers. 5G is turning out to be a lot more expensive than projected, the rollout has slowed, so equipment makers like No…
-
comment
Comment #37324130
Cool project! I worked on a hybrid airship project. H vs He. H for the win. H gives 10% more lift than He, and you can manufacture more H. Long-term this efficiency will allow you …
-
comment
Comment #36975093
Look at the balance sheet 10K and 10Q filings. Additional Paid-In Capital is basically all the accumulated equity investment. Add in the current long-term debt. That gives you an a…
-
comment
Comment #36958258
Despite operating for 14 years (1) and $51,488,000,000 of effective capital investment (2) Uber STILL loses money. The quarterly operating profit they reported is not GAAP net inco…
-
comment
Comment #36622245
Thanks! We worked really hard on the design to be functionally useful while visually striking. We are fans of Bauhaus design. Weight > The total weight is probably similar at 10 po…
-
comment
Comment #36622066
Glad to hear you found the thread interesting. Kioma does provide an Isofix detachable base, but in the U.S. it is called Latch. Same thing, different name. All U.S. infant child r…
-
comment
Comment #36617146
The US standard is FMVSS 213. In Europe, seat manufacturers currently must comply with standards UN R44/04 or UN R129 (i-Size).
-
comment
Comment #36615416
A good dialogue is always fun. Thanks for bringing some science to the thread. You've hit the nail on the proverbial head regarding misuse. Misuse is a problem across installation …
-
comment
Comment #36611352
Ah, ok, and thanks for clarifying. The Kioma base is low profile (vertical height), and only 1/2 inch out from the passenger seat upright face (your "fore-aft" distance). It does n…
-
comment
Comment #36610964
You're welcome. Thanks for asking! If you have other questions, please drop me a line at support@kioma.us and mention your HN profile.
-
comment
Comment #36610857
Feedback is always welcome. Thanks for checking it out! I may botch the response to your points, but I'll give it a try below. Force > To use the base, yes some force is required. …
-
comment
Comment #36609291
Any seat belt in an automobile is a single point of failure by your logic. Seat belts are fantastic tech, though. Seat belt webbing is designed to take 11,120 Newtons (FMVSS 209). …
-
comment
Comment #36609242
Think of the dollar cost amortization! You need to have more children to average down the cost. So you can use the car seat across 3-4 kids. In all seriousness, the problem with do…
-
comment
Comment #36609081
Yes to this.
-
comment
Comment #36609054
Someone further down the thread had a similar negative response to that phrase and suggested maybe "parent tested" as a substitute? Thanks for the feedback!
-
comment
Comment #36609033
Thank you! Encouragement is always welcome.
-
comment
Comment #36608969
Great feedback. Thank you! I'll pass it on to the marketing team.
-
comment
Comment #36608942
We're happy to license out tech.
-
comment
Comment #36608540
Test Results > NHSTA used to publish their test results of all car seats, but no longer do so. FMVSS 213 (the US standard) tests for Head Injury Criterion (36 millisecond), Excursi…