Viewing profile — antubbs
antubbs
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jan 19, 2011, 8:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 67
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About antubbs
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #13891537
Eh. e.g. the north atlantic tracks have been around since the 1960s. GPS wasn't available to the public until Korean Air Lines Flight 007 in the 1980s.
-
comment
Comment #13853489
With the disclaimer that I have no idea what I'm doing and there are probably many flaws in this reasoning: A metric ton of bunker is about $300 ( http://shipandbunker.com/prices )…
-
comment
Comment #13851751
Newer ships aren't necessarily much better. Mærsk's E class container ships still burn bunker fuel. The Triple E Class made improvements in efficiency and emissions, but are still …
-
comment
Comment #13685302
The 747 is certainly iconic, but I hate to be the one to tell you that 747 production may be coming to an end as the industry has zero interest in inefficient four-engine jets. Bas…
-
comment
Comment #10687322
The hilarious thing is that the KC-46 is basically a means of keeping the Boeing 767 production line open and operating and producing airplanes even though Boeing has replaced it w…
-
comment
Comment #10687306
Pretty much. The B-1 was designed for a role (low altitude nape of the earth bombing) that was obsolete before they worked out the bugs in the jet (Russian interceptor and fighter …
-
comment
Comment #10687295
There have never been very many operational Tu-160 bombers in service. The Tu-160 is focused on the standoff weapon role, and is ideally meant to delivering tactical ordinance whil…
-
comment
Comment #8762302
The shuttle's promise (inexpensive frequent launches) never materialized. Instead it was an incredibly complicated and expensive system to operate, launch, service, and recover. Sp…
-
comment
Comment #8762278
There's been Russian military use of grid fins on supersonic rockets and missiles for many decades. It's my understanding that supersonic flow is not a problem, rather transonic (m…
-
comment
Comment #8689766
It's a launch platform without clear future missions or funding. After the surplus RS-25 engines from the shuttle program are used (designed to be re-usable, they are heavy and exp…
-
comment
Comment #8148638
I guess this is my concern as well. I'm not sure what the need is for the shiny new object in this case; I've never felt limited by Vim, but perhaps there are particular features o…
-
comment
Comment #8000159
I'm not sure it makes sense to assume that all launch companies want to scale up and build vastly bigger rockets. SpaceX did it to go after the CRS launches, and now onto larger co…
-
comment
Comment #7998965
I don't think it is accurate to suggest that this company is competing with SpaceX. It is accurate that SpaceX is trying to provide lower-cost launch capability and it is accurate …
-
comment
Comment #6475543
So, it's certainly happened: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_satellite_collision I'm nowhere near talented enough to talk in terms of "odds" with respect to satellite collisions,…
-
comment
Comment #6213782
Can't speak to the plan for the second stage (which will do a once-around and de-orbit if I understand correctly), but the first stage will not be following a ballistic trajectory …
-
comment
Comment #6211560
The assumption with the F-35 seems to be that technology (better sensors & automation) will overcome performance & armament disparities. This is not a new assumption in the air sup…
-
comment
Comment #6211535
To their credit, the F-117 also wasn't a multirole fighter, was built in low quantities, wasn't planned for export uses, and was relatively quickly retired. It's a one-trick pony d…
-
comment
Comment #6211442
Range, thrust, and power to weight are just a few performance parameters. It's somewhat more difficult to get accurate turn performance and acceleration information about the F-35.…
-
comment
Comment #6211416
This is more conjecture, but I don't think this is so much a capability problem (they're already mounting stingers on drones; larger models with large electronic sensor platforms/r…
-
comment
Comment #6211350
Gotta be careful about history; when the F-35 program started, drone-based warfare was pretty infantile. Drone payloads are still relatively light compared to heavily-laden fighter…
-
comment
Comment #6211337
I don't believe this is accurate. The F-16 is the "low" part of the "high/low" multirole fighter strategy. For the air force, the "high" jet is the F-15. The F-22 is predominantly …
- story
-
comment
Comment #3981808
I think that's been beaten to death with http://www.quora.com/Engineering-Management/Why-are-software...
- story
-
comment
Comment #2602567
It seems like the thesis is that C++ is a more complicated language, and therefore the code produced in it is more complicated and harder to comprehend. This line of reasoning is s…