Viewing profile — antidesitter
antidesitter
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 02, 2018, 10:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 224
- Public activity
- 545 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About antidesitter
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #20380652
> I can google IEnumerable a lot more easily than "what is -> after ::" That's not really a fair comparison. You're comparing an identifier in one language with the basic syntax of…
-
comment
Comment #20380573
I already addressed that under the very comment you linked to. The fact that you readily accuse me of breaking the rules but then consider discussing the merits of that accusation …
-
comment
Comment #20380542
> Your first comment upthread was obviously unsubstantive Which one? The one asking for a source on an incredible claim? That's not welcome on HN? Regarding the cases you linked to…
-
comment
Comment #20380462
Don’t be ridiculous, dang. Requesting sources for an incredible and unsubstantiated claim is in no way “dismissive, hostile, and/or unsubstantive”. > You've been doing it a lot I d…
-
comment
Comment #20379602
> Turkey would've gladly assisted the US in this case What case? After the assassination? > and urged the US for action What action? When? > There are other ways to protect US citi…
-
comment
Comment #20378337
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #20378312
So no sources, just a downvote. As expected.
-
comment
Comment #20378270
> Isn't the American president a barometer or descriptive reflection of the democratic population? For a sufficiently loose definition of “reflection”, yes. For a sufficiently tigh…
-
comment
Comment #20378222
It’s clickbait. These experiments show no inconsistency in quantum mechanics, which can be easily seen if you think about the whole system as a single wavefunction under unitary ev…
-
comment
Comment #20376624
You’re equating the president with conservatism?
-
comment
Comment #20376607
> One party wants to consider executing women who terminate pregnancies for their own safety. Source?
-
comment
Comment #20376544
To give you an idea of what your comment sounds like: Does the content of the beliefs matter? Is it easier to be tolerant of free speech than Communism?
-
comment
Comment #20376347
That’s a very strange reading of the parent comment.
-
comment
Comment #20376256
> I think "successful" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in this sentence. How?
-
comment
Comment #20370673
> A free market is one in which, once uniform or standard rules or requirements are established This is not correct. A free market is a market that is free from government interfer…
-
comment
Comment #20359125
You didn't say it was possible (which almost anything is in this context). You said it was inevitable .
-
comment
Comment #20359104
If such conditions change the price of labour, for example, they are by definition an interference with price mechanisms. The magnitude of the interference will depend on the magni…
-
comment
Comment #20350363
> whenever "prevent competitors from reaching the market" is on the table So when you don’t have a free market?
-
comment
Comment #20350182
> Someone will point at the GDP going up and say this justifies literally everything that corporations do. Someone will draw comparisons between two lines on a graph and say this i…
-
comment
Comment #20350121
> Starting from a totally free market, regulatory capture is inevitable. How?
-
comment
Comment #20349855
> free markets require a ton of government-backed regulations What’s this “ton of government-backed regulations” you’re referring to? > Radical advocates of free markets... always …
-
comment
Comment #20349834
> "Free Market" is a terrible term, the freedom of the market needs to be defined. Free market: A market that is free from government interference, prices rising and falling in acc…
-
comment
Comment #20287574
Elaborate?
-
comment
Comment #20269940
I didn’t visualize it when I first read your comment, but I can visualize it if prompted. This might be because information can be parsed and stored more quickly in abstract terms,…
-
comment
Comment #20260076
Read the grandparent comment.