Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — anseljh

anseljh

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jul 13, 2011, 3:22 AM UTC
HN karma
138
Public activity
80 items

About anseljh

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #19371235

    Fun fact: there is also no express patent license in GPLv2. There have been lawsuits on that. I know because I was the lawyer who filed one of them. So...yeah, this problem is not …

  2. comment
    Comment #13528720

    Nope. Typography was an excellent vessel for a history lesson here.

  3. comment
    Comment #13526409

    Don't forget the typography on the SS's IBM Hollerith punch cards, too. Scroll down, 2nd to last image. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/ibm-and-quot-death-s-cal...

  4. comment
    Comment #11597952

    Yes, federal magistrate judges.

  5. comment
    Comment #10813678

    The declassified NRO documents are here: http://www.nro.gov/foia/declass/MOL.html

  6. story
  7. story
  8. comment
    Comment #10509342

    Check out "Asc"'s comment: "There are adblocker-blocker-blockers definition lists... if you can make sense of that. In other words, there are subscriptions (as simple as checking a…

  9. comment
    Comment #10427691

    Interesting! Notably, "Percentage of Requests Where Some Data Produced" is all 0%.

  10. comment
    Comment #10347994

    Well, everyone would be able to use YC Research's public outputs defensively as prior art.

  11. comment
    Comment #10334701

    Did you read the post?

  12. comment
    Comment #10334690

    Why isn't this the default?

  13. comment
    Comment #10263668

    Try another point of view. If this review was done outside the case, then it would very likely have to be re-done later IN the case with expert witnesses who are disclosed to the o…

  14. comment
    Comment #10263629

    I admit, my attention was divided earlier between Hacker News and my day job as a California IP litigator . Here you go: Yes, the UTSA statute is "the law". But it's not the ONLY l…

  15. comment
    Comment #10263578

    Well, good thing you're not my client. :)

  16. comment
    Comment #10262831

    If you wish to brave the San Francisco Superior Court's abysmal court records website, you can plug in case number "CGC 15 545359" to see the docket and view the documents in the c…

  17. comment
    Comment #10262819

    Um. That "old" "tradition" is binding law until it's overruled. It hasn't been. Again, here are the current California trade secrets statutes: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fac…

  18. comment
    Comment #10262812

    California trade secrets law has not changed drastically since 2005. If you have actual information to the contrary, by all means, point to it. You're correct that there's more to …

  19. comment
    Comment #10262769

    The law of customer lists being trade secrets is literally centuries old. Perhaps you're remembering a recent case about whether LinkedIn contacts could qualify as trade secrets, w…

  20. comment
    Comment #10262695

    In the US, the loser doesn't even always pay the legal fees. It depends.

  21. comment
    Comment #10262683

    That can be done -- there is a claim for malicious prosecution. But you have to win the first case before you can bring it. The other alternative, in the current case, is to ask th…

  22. comment
    Comment #10262668

    This is SUPER wrong. Customer lists were one of the original trade secrets under common law, and they still are trade secrets--as long as they're kept secret. More modern applicati…

  23. comment
    Comment #10248673

    Downvoting reality.. nice work, HN! Here's how contracts work: A makes an offer to exchange something of value. If B accepts that offer, there's a contract. How's that work for web…

  24. comment
    Comment #10240874

    The terms of service for the site that's delivered to you over HTTP, though--that is a legally binding contract. Some have no-ad-blocking terms.

  25. comment
    Comment #10225119

    No, the school board should find them.