Viewing profile — anonHacker2
anonHacker2
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 23, 2020, 7:10 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 39
- Public activity
- 7 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About anonHacker2
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #24575772
Subparagraph (c)1(B) says that the only safe harbor for removing content is (c)(2). (c)(2)(A) restricts the criteria that can be used to remove content to the following: "obscene, …
-
comment
Comment #24573544
> Replace Vague Terminology in (c)(2). First, the Department supports replacing the vague catch-all "otherwise objectionable" language... This disallows the common practice of open…
-
comment
Comment #24571517
Something like this will probably pass eventually because there is bipartisan support. Biden said in January that he thinks that Section 230 should be "revoked... immediately.”
-
comment
Comment #24571376
Why do you say "clearly you can moderate based on your ToS"? I don't see anything here would permit the ToS to have moderation criteria such as "off-topic" while retaining the safe…
-
comment
Comment #24571271
Section (g)(3) says that "Being responsible in whole or in part for the creation or development of information includes, but is not limited to, instances in which a person or entit…
-
comment
Comment #24571258
Section (d)(2)(B) makes it illegal NOT to "expeditiously" remove illegal content once a provider has "actual notice" of illegality. If someone has a blog that they don't really mai…
-
comment
Comment #24571250
This law would make it illegal to host discussion forums such as Hacker News. Subparagraph (c)1(B) says that the only safe harbor for removing content is (c)(2). (c)(2)(A) restrict…