Viewing profile — anon400232
anon400232
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 02, 2016, 4:39 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 65
- Public activity
- 50 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About anon400232
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #33780187
Bowing to censorship? Bowing isn't necessarily done happily. Or maybe more ideas are also in play? Perhaps recognizing the existing power dynamics? Perhaps playing the game over a …
-
comment
Comment #33780083
> I don’t ever want to hear again how Apple is some champion of privacy and ethics. It is easy to criticize an organizations' behavior. It is easy to criticize someone else's ethic…
-
comment
Comment #33780032
> Best not to conflate ethics and privacy. Indeed. I'd suggest everyone in our industry study ethics, particularly with an eye towards its (i) philosophical foundations and (ii) cu…
-
comment
Comment #33779880
Fair points. Stargate: wow! With that kind of return on investment on $20 M, psychic readings for $10 a pop sound like a bargain in comparison. At worst, the readers are good at re…
-
comment
Comment #33772994
> To top it off, Mark’s vision of VR and how stubborn he is with the infamous Metaverse will really just push FB to bankruptcy. Unless an activist investor pushes them to fire him …
-
comment
Comment #33772985
Tell me more about your claim that an org, person, or brand gets only one chance at trust. What exactly do you mean? What about the passage of time? Memories can be reshaped; publi…
-
comment
Comment #33772857
Knowledge of this kind of disruption leads to more disruption? Why? What theories support this? Has this been shown empirically?
-
comment
Comment #33725440
Where did you hear about it?
-
comment
Comment #33712354
> You have the option already to hold on for 5 years+. The difference is having the option. :) Behavior tends to be different if you don't have the option to sell during a window o…
-
comment
Comment #33705702
> I don't care about your feelings This is the mark of a troubled human being. Your behaviors are not beneficial for yourself or for this community. You seem to think you are stand…
-
comment
Comment #33705361
> Since I left AWS in 2020, I’ve been super-careful not to share things from behind the scenes. I can’t actually remember the details of the nondisclosure agreement, but I have str…
-
comment
Comment #33705308
Sarcasm? Forgive those of us who can't tell.
-
comment
Comment #33705302
Share a link demonstrating the BBC's egregiousness please.
-
comment
Comment #33705265
Merkle trees are an incredible technology too. My point? There are many incredible technologies, but not all are "secret weapons" that justify a seismic industry shift. Not all are…
-
comment
Comment #33705185
> This is false. People invest on many year horizons all of the time when they believe in the company. Granted, but they usually have the option to sell at many points along the wa…
-
comment
Comment #33705096
Saying everyone is replaceable is a first-degree approximation. The next level of detail would talk about, at least: (a) how much knowledge gets lost; (b) how many person hours -an…
-
comment
Comment #33705053
Hello tip, meet iceberg.
-
comment
Comment #33705046
One problem with a humorous (yes, I am not all serious all the time) comment like this is while there could be some degree truth to it -- provide a source if so, please -- it smack…
-
comment
Comment #33691748
Privacy is not a one dimensional thing. Just like security, it exists in context, relative to a threat model. Think about the threat model for an "everyday" person. It is different…
-
comment
Comment #33691647
"I'll take anal bum cover for $7000." -fake Sean Connery on SNL Jeopardy, selecting from the "An Album Cover" category
-
comment
Comment #33672431
I found some studies from OSHA (the United States gov't agency) about very high carbon dioxide levels in certain industry settings, such as where dry ice is used. Effects on cognit…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #33663800
Let's talk about those four words: 1. Your comment is claiming that my comment is overgeneralized? It is not. 2. I will grant my reply may be uninteresting to you. Unfortunately it…
-
comment
Comment #33663267
You are lashing out. I'm sorry you feel hurt or insulted. My first comment did not attack you personally. It criticized your writing and reasoning. Substantively, I disagree with a…
-
comment
Comment #33648284
My comment stated what I thought of your comment. It was blunt and short but not without meaning. The brevity might suggest to you that I didn't think your comment warranted additi…