Viewing profile — annexrichmond

The problem he was reacting to (local decisions dominated by people with locked-in benefits and low future exposure) is real. His idea there is silly but I think treating a couple …

The link you shared is just a podcast and does not contain even contain “far right”. Can you provide specific concerns, otherwise I don’t see anything wrong with a CEO of the most …

I’ve recently discovered Galbitang and despite being far less popular, I much prefer it over pho. We make it in a pressure cooker as well and love how easy it is!

> the bet on camera-only driven system did not pay off This is a pretty unsubstantiated claim. Tesla is now launching robotaxis at a fraction of the cost of Waymos, in part because…

Yet you conveniently forgot about this [1] > When asked if it would be OK to misgender the high-profile trans woman Caitlin Jenner if it was the only way to avoid nuclear apocalyps…

Well, historically this has been more effective than any other system known to man.

If it was working “fine” then why was Iran able to reach 60% enriched uranium and enough for 10 nuclear weapons if they were able to enrich further?

So you think the US should sit back and watch Iran develop nukes? Is that the “moral” thing to do?

A quick search suggests 25k Canadians enter the US daily for multi-day trips. If ICE was any real concern here for Canadians we'd hear a lot more about it I think.

The cases you link relate to someone with previous convictions that could affect their legal status and someone potentially filing faulty documents and overstaying their legal stat…

There's not much precedent to get a powerful, vulnerable country to willingly disarm their nukes. It's fair to say Israel shouldn't have them but I'd be far more uncomfortable with…

OP basically said every country is the same, has the same motive, so therefore it's ok for them to have nukes if others have them. That couldn't be more naive, and the Nazi regime …

Sure. Hitler was also a vegetarian. Is that really your best argument?

US doesn't have to engage for Iran to use nukes. But of course we should prevent that from becoming a realistic scenario?

> We supposedly destroyed their nuclear program last summer. And somehow their nuclear potential just became a war-worthy threat in February? What news are you even reading? You ar…

[flagged]

They were able to move and hide a lot of the enriched uranium ahead of those bombings. Not all of it was destroyed.

Nobody is saying they are acceptable. But it'd be naive to say there's ever zero risk. What's your brilliant plan? Let Iran have nukes?

[flagged]

This reminds me of this great talk from Temporal about how they built their Python SDK by creating a distributed deterministic event loop on top of asyncio[1] [1] https://www.youtu…

I don’t get why they get so much praise for design with such a big design flaw: If a flight is delayed even 1 minute, it’s highlighted as red text. This throws me off every time. G…

Half the comments in this thread are not following the guidelines

[flagged]

the headline literally says "could", not that it did. can you point to evidence that DOGE cutbacks did negatively affect aviation safety, particularly with regards to ATCs?