Viewing profile — annadane
annadane
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 08, 2018, 4:29 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 642
- Public activity
- 451 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About annadane
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37043418
I laughed
-
comment
Comment #36763855
They sold it under the condition he wouldn't lie, it was a condition for him to have it, and he lied
-
comment
Comment #36763786
Yes but the original founders did that. Zuckerberg took it from them and immediately lied about data sharing, there's a reason why the founders left in disgust
-
comment
Comment #36582954
The problem with Facebook's products always comes down to one overriding fact, Zuckerberg's desire to win over everybody else; he's constantly been accused of stealing from people,…
-
comment
Comment #35620826
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #35555963
Sure, network effects are hard to overcome; my point is that Zuckerberg bought it as a competition killing move so they're not likely to put any quality control into it
-
comment
Comment #35555864
But why would anyone use Whatsapp after the Onavo stuff?
-
comment
Comment #35547671
I think people are missing the point when they call Metaverse a 'misstep' because it implies Zuckerberg was a good actor who just happened to get this one thing wrong... if you loo…
-
comment
Comment #34866408
My first impression of this is literally "So, maybe a good idea, but isn't this Zuckerberg just copying yet another person like he's always done forever?"
-
comment
Comment #34027907
He's not high, he's been treating people like contempt ever since Harvard, this isn't new
-
comment
Comment #34023182
Forcing a mandatory Facebook account is "doing an ok job"...?
-
comment
Comment #33601728
Lots of suspiciously downvoted comments here.
-
comment
Comment #33459851
The thing is, I wouldn't want to use Whatsapp considering how Facebook got it: spy on people with Onavo and then basically pressure the original founders out of the company, and th…
-
comment
Comment #33407123
And I bet if it was only Apple's iOS changes they would be fine, but that combined with Zuck's Metaverse obsession is dragging them under
-
comment
Comment #33236859
But given his history of acquiring the product he has no right to talk; what he did is blatantly criminal
-
comment
Comment #33236235
lol. Zuck, you spied on people with Onavo and kicked Acton and Koum out of the company, you have no moral standing whatsoever
-
comment
Comment #33199520
A lot of websites are like this for products, it makes it really tedious to navigate
-
comment
Comment #33179565
Is this Moxie's decision?
-
comment
Comment #33101994
Google has a lot of failures of their own but they seem at least semi-committed to an open internet (with actual ethical standards), something I can't exactly say for Zuckerberg
-
comment
Comment #33016228
And yet Meta was involved with things like Free Basics, or forcing the Oculus account with a bait and switch, and repeatedly lying about Whatsapp - but I'm sure this Instagram thin…
-
comment
Comment #32970142
Yeah, but specifically Zuckerberg. He's never cared about other people
-
comment
Comment #32844878
I'm seeing a few posts here that basically they have to do this because it's an ad service, it's for shareholders, etc. When are we going to blame Zuck and his unique brand of dish…
-
comment
Comment #32690852
Or legally required to provide a chronological feed, which even logged-in users don't get
-
comment
Comment #32684547
Incentive? How about "don't be monopolistic assholes"?
-
comment
Comment #32684286
Take down some of the most egregious pages and disinformation? No, we (Facebook/Meta) will waste our time shutting down anything remotely challenging to our monstrosity we're tryin…