Viewing profile — angoragoats
angoragoats
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 17, 2023, 5:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 771
- Public activity
- 743 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About angoragoats
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49265163
lol care to elaborate or are you just here to sling insults?
-
comment
Comment #49244221
What accusations am I making? Pretending that you can read someone’s mind is pretty dishonest as well.
-
comment
Comment #49235056
Why would you not instead use your skills to "get people into" reading books that have actual verifiable truth, that advance their knowledge about the world, that educate them abou…
-
comment
Comment #49202708
This is not in any way a counter to the post you’re replying to; both can be true.
-
comment
Comment #49202661
Thank you for speaking truth; I hope you don’t get flagged like I did.
-
comment
Comment #49195394
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49154291
I guess I’ll just keep flagging every single Twitter link on this site. I hope that some day the community here will grow a spine.
-
comment
Comment #49148187
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49133150
Thanks for your thoughtful reply! Yeah, I just wouldn’t speculate that much. If someone had put a gun to my head and asked me for an estimate of value, I’d probably give a huge ran…
-
comment
Comment #49124711
If I had used ChatGPT in the way you described, I would have likely verified that the numbers sourced from search results it found were used correctly when it was "doing some numbe…
-
comment
Comment #49118171
That was only one of the differences mentioned; the others were on the cartridge itself and included a different sticker on the back and different manufacturing codes.
-
comment
Comment #49118152
Ah yes, because a probabilistic text generator should be trusted to appraise a rare collectible that wasn't even known to exist as of the time it was trained.
-
comment
Comment #49116146
> I didn't agree that any assertion I have made was false Yes, you did, implicitly, by adding additional qualifications to your original assertion: that it’s ok to reply “no” when …
-
comment
Comment #49111158
This is one of the many reasons why I replied "100% disagree" when you originally wrote "if someone writes a detailed reply, replying ‘no’ is rude." I wasn't even sure why you wrot…
-
comment
Comment #49104321
> no > If someone writes a detailed reply, replying ‘no’ is rude. You’re an amazing caricature of an internet commenter.
-
comment
Comment #49096791
Agreed. Devin Wenig (the aforementioned CEO) is a thug and criminal who should be in prison. His statements about this incident are laughable; he claimed in a statement recently th…
-
comment
Comment #49068716
> It wouldn't, I'd be saddened that you don't know how to to have a civil discussion with others on a technical site after two decades, but I'd still feel that you should know that…
-
comment
Comment #49057850
What if I told you I’ve been on HN since approximately when your account was created? Would that change your opinions at all? (Hint: ideally it shouldn’t, because basing your opini…
-
comment
Comment #49050689
> It’s reasonable for technical discussions to have professionalism and adult behaviour. I agree. My point is that I believe the comment you got upset about was in fact not as rude…
-
comment
Comment #49046706
If I was diagnosed with cancer, I would follow the advice of my medical team, _especially_ and without question if they told me that the cancer was curable in a high percentage of …
-
comment
Comment #49046670
> If someone writes a detailed reply, replying ‘no’ is rude. 100% disagree, and that’s not what happened here anyway. > Straw man arguments are incredibly disrespectful, and most p…
-
comment
Comment #49039859
OK. I wouldn't call this rude, much less "incredibly rude," perhaps the word I'd use is "blunt." But whatever. I continue to wish there was a "block this user" feature on this site…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49038531
What OP might be (crudely) referring to is that Jobs had a rare (~1% of cases IIRC) curable form of pancreatic cancer, and ignored his doctors' advice to have it treated and remove…
-
comment
Comment #49038382
> you're rude a/nd disrespectful so I don't want to spent more time interacting with you unless you apologize. What? The person you're replying to didn't use any harsh language or …