Viewing profile — angarrido
angarrido
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Mar 28, 2026, 12:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About angarrido
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #47792794
[dead]
- story
-
comment
Comment #47787010
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47786985
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47754940
must people think it’s just GPU cost. In practice it’s coordination: model latency variance + queueing + retries under load. You don’t scale linearly, you get cascading slowdowns.
-
comment
Comment #47749415
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47742457
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47741781
I built this because I couldn’t use Copilot or Claude at work without risking exposing internal code. This runs fully local (Gemma 4 26B), indexes your codebase, and answers questi…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47731634
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47728404
Local inference is getting solved pretty quickly. What still seems unsolved is how to safely use it on real private systems (large codebases, internal tools, etc) where you can’t r…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47719791
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47719695
Awesome idea, usually LLMs lack of creativity, so layouts look mostly the same, I could give a try
-
comment
Comment #47719589
[dead]
- story
-
comment
Comment #47554926
Interesting approach. One thing I’ve been running into is that even with good alerts, the harder problem ends up being when to actually be exposed. You can get the signal right and…