Viewing profile — andrenth

“Brazilian Supreme Court suddenly deems 11-year-old law unconstitutional after their own corruption is exposed on social media”

Flagged

I guess if it's not metaphysics then it's physics.

Users obtained via state censorship should be a reason for shame, not celebration.

Of all the ridiculous dictator bootlicker replies in this thread, this one takes the prize. Brazil's population is ~215 million. Let me call a judge to report your misinformation.

This is the slippery slope fallacy fallacy.

US median household income increased after the 2017 corporate tax cuts. https://fee.org/articles/us-household-incomes-increased-more...

Is someone working on a Nomad fork?

> It IS disclosed for the involved and accused parties. Nope, defense attorneys have not had access to case files in many instances. > Hate speech, spread disinformation about elec…

> Ok, now you need to prove that the conditions are not being met. As the prosecutors in each case will present the proofs for each case when the inquiry becomes a criminal case. I…

> Not censorship. Brazilian law allows you to remove content in case of criminal investigation, threatenings, unbased defamation.... The law allows that under certain conditions, y…

Once again you don't address the points in my previous points and reply with something completely different. > All your interpretation and from some of jurists that you cite is tha…

Please cite one example of illegal content and the law that makes it illegal.

> As already mentioned, the first item is false. It's not false and it was only made possible by a corruption of the written words in the Supreme Court regiment AND by ignoring the…

There are at least 8 reasons it is illegal. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39966382