Viewing profile — andreiw
andreiw
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 24, 2014, 11:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 289
- Public activity
- 209 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About andreiw
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17545761
Dumb question, but how would it fare on a ppc64le box like the (OpenPower) Power9 Talos II? https://www.raptorcs.com/TALOSII/prerelease.php
-
comment
Comment #17351587
On a related note, another interesting CPU design - http://multiclet.com/index.php/en/support/general-technical-...
-
comment
Comment #17351526
Also 64-bit Arm...
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17308279
Yeah I’d say that modern OoO Arm implementations (A57, A72, ...) are worth trying to speculate into trapped VFP state. Lazy FPU is definitly a thing everywhere. My hunch says that …
-
comment
Comment #17307510
Not numerating it? Variant 6 is as good as anything...
-
comment
Comment #17307501
Do we have PoC code? Has anyone tried attacking FP/SIMD state on other ISAs like Power or AArch64?
-
comment
Comment #17307485
What are we calling this Spectre variant?
-
comment
Comment #17200304
As usual, Carl Icahn...
-
comment
Comment #17200286
Then tell your SiP to do better. On Arm the conditional speculation barrier couldn’t be more lightweight (CSDB).
-
comment
Comment #17190196
“break”? no, but spectre is a confidentiality attack, and not even the only confidentiality attack that can be done... yes you could, but the noise floor won’t be great
-
comment
Comment #17190168
Depends on how you define hardware and software. There are global workarounds that amount to crippling CPU behavior, to provide guarantees for code not written to be spectre safe. …
-
comment
Comment #17190134
Considering the hardware mitigations aren’t some magic bullet, but are a “big hammer” that cripples CPU OoO behavior in crrtain ways for everything , software mitigations don’t see…
-
comment
Comment #17079010
Anyone else use the hex “assembler” on the TI-83+? After a while you just memorize the hex opcodes for z80 insns... TI-GCC for my TI-89 was nice...a few years back I tried to dust-…
-
comment
Comment #16950671
Not yet... the good news is that iPXE supports the SMSC USB NIC on the Pi. I don't know if iPXE will work out of the box, but I certainly intend on porting the iPXE NIC driver as a…
-
comment
Comment #16950664
Maybe. I'll look.
-
comment
Comment #16925369
There's a few problems there, but these amount to UEFI being a terrible, abominable spec. The specification doesn't say that an implementation must not change the memory map inside…
-
comment
Comment #16924518
Author here, feel free to AMA.
-
comment
Comment #16924501
If you run the “mmap” command in UEFI shell, and count the memory regions marked as Runtime Code and Runtime Data, that will give you the total resident (after booting OS) memory f…
-
comment
Comment #16924487
Yep, and being able to claim that U-boot can boot Windows (on x64 or Arm) would be a really strong statement around completeness. I hope someone gets to work on it soon (Alexander …
-
comment
Comment #16924460
RaspberriPiPkg can’t boot Raspbian today, since the latter is 32-bit. Can boot stock 64-bit SUSE and Ubuntu, though.
-
comment
Comment #16924446
A lot of it really is code quality issues, both in the core and some of the contributed I/O drivers.
-
comment
Comment #16924435
Author here. If you wanted to run you own drivers, or had code written specifically against protocols exported by Tiano components I believe the answer is - yes. RaspberryPiPkg is …
-
comment
Comment #16861766
Actually, good question to flip back to you. As a random person stumbling upon this, what value would you assign to it? What could you imagine the end goal to be?
-
comment
Comment #16861754
Arm derived: 32-bit Cortex-A and a Cortex-M for radio. Curious what the security arch is...