Viewing profile — andreigheorghe
andreigheorghe
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 23, 2012, 2:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 416
- Public activity
- 49 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About andreigheorghe
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39748141
I think what they mean is that yes, the signalling needs to be done over "traditional" web APIs (websockets, etc), but that's just for discovering/negotiating the p2p connections. …
-
comment
Comment #36985408
...who are you arguing with?
-
comment
Comment #34897975
cool story, now try writing a "Hello World full stack web app" in turbo pascal.
-
comment
Comment #34425552
maybe it's trained on non-published documentation pages?
-
comment
Comment #34244995
You do control who you follow on Twitter.
-
comment
Comment #31098083
are you asking for examples of things that were outlawed?
-
comment
Comment #30168243
the value the js community gets from `fetch` being a unified standard is far, far greater than the benefit you as a developer would get from not having to add 15 extra LOC around `…
-
comment
Comment #27140584
You're going awfully out of your way to not engage with the arguments you're presented with by other people, dismissing them with sardonic one-liners, and making wild assumptions a…
-
comment
Comment #25516799
> I would love to have undo! not sure if they added this literally in the last 18 hours, but the usual CMD+Z undo shortcut seems to work for me.
-
comment
Comment #22298447
No, it's a reverse funnel system.
- story
-
comment
Comment #21734159
You're lying and gaslighting. > The Mueller report contains new information about how the Russian government hacked documents and emails from Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaig…
-
comment
Comment #21734132
You expect a (good) product manager to be reasonably technically competent so that they can carry a conversation with business/customers without having to go back to engineering ev…
-
comment
Comment #21657112
Nice work moving the goalposts :) If, being aware of everything that's happening around us, you still choose to represent reality as "ridiculous conspiracy theorizing", then you're…
-
comment
Comment #21647771
> According to a telegram that remained buried until now in the cache of 250,000 diplomatic cables leaked by WikiLeaks in 2010 care to try that argument again, taking into account …
-
comment
Comment #21322060
You just can't stick to the topic, can you? You seem to have specific obsessions that you feel the need to drag into the discussion. Get some fresh air and try behaving like an adu…
-
comment
Comment #21311203
That's a load of rubbish that you've either made up, or swallowed without thinking.
-
comment
Comment #21280953
Nope, the subject is "Twitter controlling the discourse is different than the Russian government controlling the discourse", nothing to do with what you're trying to deflect to. Tr…
-
comment
Comment #21269397
Changing the subject seems to be a common tactic when you've run out of good faith arguments.
-
comment
Comment #21159903
So then you just created this account to tell us that Facebook banned you for no reason even though you posted nothing? Interesting, why did you do that?
-
comment
Comment #21099897
> stating, without any evidence, that somehow conservatives claiming victimization is par for the course is about as low value as a comment can get > the left wing using their utte…
-
comment
Comment #21095401
You keep ignoring the fact that it's a baby account pushing a agenda that's ridiculously off topic. In no way is that the same as someone's biased opinion, no matter how much you t…
-
comment
Comment #21094135
One is a fake account pushing misinformation, the other is a real person sharing their succinct, if low signal, opinion. So, not really the same thing. This thread is a dumpster fi…
-
comment
Comment #21093962
His account is 5 years old and has 887 karma. What are you talking about?
-
comment
Comment #21092901
Did you just create an account to inject some conservative victimization into a story that has absolutely no connection to that?