Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — ancap

ancap

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jul 01, 2014, 2:27 PM UTC
HN karma
54
Public activity
284 items

About ancap

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40297511

    > Um...how many stories in the media, from the front page of the NYTimes to top-grossing movies, are about the incompetence & evils of governments & members of ruling classes? I do…

  2. comment
    Comment #40297048

    > I find this definition interesting because it seems to me there’s a very prevalent portrayal in media pointing towards the opposite, that is that humans left alone (read, without…

  3. comment
    Comment #40297009

    Compared to today? In the past century hundreds of millions of people have been slaughtered by states. Compare that with any "private sector" killing, now or in "early civilization…

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #17443475

    I think there's some confusion here because often when talking about "flat" or "stagnant" wages people are referring to the idea that inflation outpaces wage increases (which is wr…

  6. comment
    Comment #17442580

    That's because wages aren't flat. All of the studies which claim wages are flat make one or more methodological errors. The errors primarily being 1) using different price deflator…

  7. comment
    Comment #17268456

    [flagged]

  8. comment
    Comment #16737402

    Actually, it doesn't make sense even if everyone is not playing fair. Self-harm is self-harm. What kind of negotiating is that? "If you shoot a hole in your boat I'll shoot one in …

  9. comment
    Comment #16735802

    Economic ignorance abounds in these comments. Tariffs are more accurately termed a punitive tax on consumers. A country enacting reciprocal tariffs is like shooting a hole in your …

  10. comment
    Comment #16554812

    Even absent government regulation, I still don't see consumers being terribly concerned about the source of their apple. Why? Because the quality of it is reflected by the reputati…

  11. comment
    Comment #16553452

    >...That's transparency The criteria you specify for transparency is subjective and I don't agree that all of those criteria are strictly necessary. Specifically, I don't agree tha…

  12. comment
    Comment #16552388

    I disagree. I think in a lot of cases buyers should or would demand transparency (ie. has this house ever been flooded?), but I don't think it's a strict requirement in the broad s…

  13. comment
    Comment #16552237

    >So I suppose in your mind that whatever a company wants to do is fine, and that's your prerogative. Non sequitur and a red herring. >To believe otherwise is to believe that a pers…

  14. comment
    Comment #16547140

    > They do not act perfectly rational. I suppose you have your own definition for "perfectly rational" that you're standing by, and that's fine. But I fail to see the point. How is …

  15. comment
    Comment #16547107

    >Yes, they did. My social security number, my address history, my employment history, all my data. I can write down in my notepad right now: s73v3r_ - thumb sucker and whether it's…

  16. comment
    Comment #16546430

    Sure people are rational, even though you as an external actor may not agree with their motives. Even a schizophrenic is rational given what they have to work with. I'm not sure wh…

  17. comment
    Comment #16546370

    >Yes it does. While you've presented a compelling counter-argument, I'm still not convinced. >And when did I agree to Equifax's terms? You didn't need to because they never stored …

  18. comment
    Comment #16545154

    I find the term "your data" bothersome. Just because there is a piece of data out there that pertains to you it doesn't make it "your data". Some will contend that the data is only…

  19. comment
    Comment #16544967

    >First, do you or anyone you know directly or indirectly profit from these types of services? Of course. No one would be using them if they weren't better off from using them.

  20. comment
    Comment #16530678

    No, I'm equating one statement of economic nonsense with another statement of economic nonsense. It was a reductio ad absurdum. Unless there are severe external market constraints …

  21. comment
    Comment #16529103

    That's just wrong and demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of basic economics. If labor were much cheaper, I personally might be willing to hire a maid, a gardener, a m…

  22. comment
    Comment #16525580

    I'm not sure what's so hard to believe about that. It's not even a controversial statement. Are you suggesting that if labor were cheaper the market would not consume more of it?

  23. comment
    Comment #16524712

    Few things hurt the poor, in particular unskilled minorities, like minimum wage. Those people are effectively outlawed from the labor market because their marginal productivity doe…

  24. comment
    Comment #16524318

    No one who is employed is paid "the true value of their labor". Every exchange, whether it's dollars for a good or dollars for labor, happens because of the subjective value the ex…

  25. comment
    Comment #16524223

    >The people in power do everything they can to keep wages down. Wages are set by the market through supply and demand