Viewing profile — ancap
ancap
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 01, 2014, 2:27 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 54
- Public activity
- 284 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ancap
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40297511
> Um...how many stories in the media, from the front page of the NYTimes to top-grossing movies, are about the incompetence & evils of governments & members of ruling classes? I do…
-
comment
Comment #40297048
> I find this definition interesting because it seems to me there’s a very prevalent portrayal in media pointing towards the opposite, that is that humans left alone (read, without…
-
comment
Comment #40297009
Compared to today? In the past century hundreds of millions of people have been slaughtered by states. Compare that with any "private sector" killing, now or in "early civilization…
- story
-
comment
Comment #17443475
I think there's some confusion here because often when talking about "flat" or "stagnant" wages people are referring to the idea that inflation outpaces wage increases (which is wr…
-
comment
Comment #17442580
That's because wages aren't flat. All of the studies which claim wages are flat make one or more methodological errors. The errors primarily being 1) using different price deflator…
-
comment
Comment #17268456
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #16737402
Actually, it doesn't make sense even if everyone is not playing fair. Self-harm is self-harm. What kind of negotiating is that? "If you shoot a hole in your boat I'll shoot one in …
-
comment
Comment #16735802
Economic ignorance abounds in these comments. Tariffs are more accurately termed a punitive tax on consumers. A country enacting reciprocal tariffs is like shooting a hole in your …
-
comment
Comment #16554812
Even absent government regulation, I still don't see consumers being terribly concerned about the source of their apple. Why? Because the quality of it is reflected by the reputati…
-
comment
Comment #16553452
>...That's transparency The criteria you specify for transparency is subjective and I don't agree that all of those criteria are strictly necessary. Specifically, I don't agree tha…
-
comment
Comment #16552388
I disagree. I think in a lot of cases buyers should or would demand transparency (ie. has this house ever been flooded?), but I don't think it's a strict requirement in the broad s…
-
comment
Comment #16552237
>So I suppose in your mind that whatever a company wants to do is fine, and that's your prerogative. Non sequitur and a red herring. >To believe otherwise is to believe that a pers…
-
comment
Comment #16547140
> They do not act perfectly rational. I suppose you have your own definition for "perfectly rational" that you're standing by, and that's fine. But I fail to see the point. How is …
-
comment
Comment #16547107
>Yes, they did. My social security number, my address history, my employment history, all my data. I can write down in my notepad right now: s73v3r_ - thumb sucker and whether it's…
-
comment
Comment #16546430
Sure people are rational, even though you as an external actor may not agree with their motives. Even a schizophrenic is rational given what they have to work with. I'm not sure wh…
-
comment
Comment #16546370
>Yes it does. While you've presented a compelling counter-argument, I'm still not convinced. >And when did I agree to Equifax's terms? You didn't need to because they never stored …
-
comment
Comment #16545154
I find the term "your data" bothersome. Just because there is a piece of data out there that pertains to you it doesn't make it "your data". Some will contend that the data is only…
-
comment
Comment #16544967
>First, do you or anyone you know directly or indirectly profit from these types of services? Of course. No one would be using them if they weren't better off from using them.
-
comment
Comment #16530678
No, I'm equating one statement of economic nonsense with another statement of economic nonsense. It was a reductio ad absurdum. Unless there are severe external market constraints …
-
comment
Comment #16529103
That's just wrong and demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of basic economics. If labor were much cheaper, I personally might be willing to hire a maid, a gardener, a m…
-
comment
Comment #16525580
I'm not sure what's so hard to believe about that. It's not even a controversial statement. Are you suggesting that if labor were cheaper the market would not consume more of it?
-
comment
Comment #16524712
Few things hurt the poor, in particular unskilled minorities, like minimum wage. Those people are effectively outlawed from the labor market because their marginal productivity doe…
-
comment
Comment #16524318
No one who is employed is paid "the true value of their labor". Every exchange, whether it's dollars for a good or dollars for labor, happens because of the subjective value the ex…
-
comment
Comment #16524223
>The people in power do everything they can to keep wages down. Wages are set by the market through supply and demand