Viewing profile — anandoza
anandoza
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 31, 2020, 1:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 102
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About anandoza
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #30504917
Could someone also write bad code and commit it using someone else's email address in the commit message, thus making the commit link to the other person's Github profile? (Sort of…
-
comment
Comment #29698838
> The driver hands you a key and leaves How?
-
comment
Comment #29407375
You don't understand how something can sound appealing at first, but then in practice isn't enjoyable?
-
comment
Comment #29407273
Well, you can apply the theorem to the problem. Or apply its principles to the problem.
-
comment
Comment #29216063
Do you know if it's the same people, or just two significant (but possibly disjoint) populations of people?
-
comment
Comment #29046306
3 hour video with no timestamps, a minimal description, and comments turned off?
-
comment
Comment #28792542
Hey, I'm not 51 yet!
-
comment
Comment #28788427
Doesn't gaining 600 points mean that you are able to beat the "old you" (or more precisely, people who you used to be even with) with 99% probability? (Or perhaps more meaningfully…
-
comment
Comment #28775848
Ah, maybe it's been changed, but now it's more clearly intentional: > A piece of information you may or may not want us to find about is your email address.... > [email address box…
-
comment
Comment #28768397
It halves your risk.
-
comment
Comment #28539304
What about sentences that end in a period without a quote? That seems like it'd be much more common.
-
comment
Comment #28498402
Yep, this blog post is in the context of using these symbols in mathematics, where this is the only usage of > that I've seen. I agree that programming languages, it can mean vario…
-
comment
Comment #28498385
It seems pretty correct to me (excluding a few things I'm not familiar enough with to evaluate). Is it possible that you misinterpreted this as a post about > in code rather than t…
-
comment
Comment #27425723
Yes, I thought the exact same as you -- that the headline meant a BCI achieved like 400 wpm or something.
-
comment
Comment #27260750
If you want to frame it that way, then each physical deck can handle 52 distinct queries. So you have 52^2 / 52 = 52 decks required.
-
comment
Comment #26290919
There are many situations where a good player can be predicted because there is a clear best option (or a good option that advance knowledge won't invalidate).
-
comment
Comment #25763846
Lichess.org actually does have a 5fold repetition rule that applies without players claiming it -- https://lichess.org/faq#threefold Kind of funny that your hypothetical example wa…
-
comment
Comment #24879803
> I always thought that it would fail to decode the string since the probability that changeme is actually valid base64 encoding must be very low I'm a bit confused, I thought any …
-
comment
Comment #24720551
Draw a graph with vertices labeled 0 through N, then add edges i->(i+1) and i->(i+2). The answer is the number of paths from 0 to N. This is still pretty specific to counting paths…
-
comment
Comment #24045846
> People’s general focus on the hose rather than the hole is well demonstrated by the fact that anyone you ask will be able to tell you how much money they make by some unit of tim…
-
comment
Comment #23879026
They mean "previous" as in before the hackers did the password resets. (So all your passwords, except the one the hackers set.) I don't think this implies a problem with "your curr…
-
comment
Comment #23670264
I think it's likely that the author's analysis of why 5 is the optimal cache size heavily depends on the fact that they only tried fib(10). For example, it's clear that cache 20 an…
-
comment
Comment #23669836
> As, we can see the optimal cache size of fib function is 5. Increasing cache size will not result in much gain in terms of speedup. Try it with fib(35), curious what you find.
-
comment
Comment #23669808
the simple recursive solution is actually O(fib(n)), which is exponential
-
comment
Comment #23193881
There are 1024 configurations for counting in binary, and only 11 for counting "normally". Some of those other ~1000 configurations are harder to do (like having every other finger…