Viewing profile — amavisca
amavisca
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 03, 2013, 5:54 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 38
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About amavisca
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #12350784
The link is similarly a white screen on Android Chrome for me.
-
comment
Comment #12263717
I was just going off what the MDN page said about it being removed in the HTML5 standard. It looks like WHATWG just has a "living standard" and W3C still uses the versioning, so it…
-
comment
Comment #12263096
This site uses the xmp tag (deprecated in HTML 3.2, removed in HTML5) which I found interesting and had never seen! https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/xm... …
-
comment
Comment #12145717
Can you add some clarity to your complaints about WebPack? What are the similarities with Grunt that aren't worth the mess and what are some of the awful habits that WebPack breeds…
-
comment
Comment #12145601
I think Redux and React-Router are very opinionated and distract people new to React from React itself. My workflow for ramping someone up on React and eventually Redux looked like…
-
comment
Comment #12145510
As someone not new to React, I'm seeing this tool as a solid replacement to the old JSX Transformer script they used to provide. Let me get up and running just a bit more quickly.
-
comment
Comment #12144534
Under the hood this is Webpack + Babel + ESLint with sane initial configuration. Love it.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #12088277
I prefer this style of component test and tend to bring in jQuery as a test dependency to remove some of the complexity of the assertions (I'm not always up to date on the current …
-
comment
Comment #11022527
If you're trying to test client side javascript with phantom + jasmine through gulp there are a few options. I googled "gulp jasmine phantom" and found 3 options at the top, one of…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #6759814
My argument would be the fact that it is "just a blogging platform."
-
comment
Comment #6712457
He recommended books in his response. You should be reading JavaScript: The Good Parts.
-
comment
Comment #6685600
My opinion would not change as far as "which looks nicer." You need to consider the context of the icon though.
-
comment
Comment #6662460
It was just posted on reddit for the 100th time (r/webdev)
-
comment
Comment #6621351
That logo makes me so uncomfortable the more I look at it. I think Odesk is probably decent for certain businesses, but I can't imagine using it for a startup. You get tacky, incon…
-
comment
Comment #6535979
Both of these companies process through First Data.
-
comment
Comment #6469502
1 - Yes 2 - Front End Development, maybe 3 - Ruby/Python/JS/PHP. JS necessary for (2)
-
comment
Comment #6463671
Handing my information to Stripe defeats the entire purpose of your application.
-
comment
Comment #6375128
You provided a single example and then skipped the alternatives.