Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — amatwl

amatwl

HN member
Joined
Thu, Feb 19, 2015, 7:11 AM UTC
HN karma
132
Public activity
45 items

About amatwl

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46029844

    The United States government is an insurance company with an army.

  2. comment
    Comment #41494298

    For the record, NT comes from the codename for the Intel i860 (N10) which was the original target platform for NT.

  3. comment
    Comment #38566805

    NetDocs was an effort in 2000/2001 that is sometimes characterized as a web productivity suite. There was an internal battle between the Netdocs and Office groups, and Office won. …

  4. comment
    Comment #36553209

    There was reporting that they were scrambling to move some infrastructure off Google since they were going to be cut off after refusing to pay their bills. The deadline was June 30…

  5. comment
    Comment #36550147

    Yep, for the record, the project was while I was still at a defense contractor :).

  6. comment
    Comment #36547558

    I literally worked on a project two years ago that was still using CORBA. Oof.

  7. comment
    Comment #35737622

    All voice assistants seem bad, but Siri seems particularly bad. God forbid I ask it to do something simple such as playing a specific artist or album on Apple Music or ask it to tu…

  8. comment
    Comment #33620425

    Footage on Shuttle SRBs was recorded onboard and downloaded when recovered. SLS' SRBs are not recovered, so no footage.

  9. comment
    Comment #33605371

    Eh, there's a difference between criticizing your boss publicly vs privately.

  10. comment
    Comment #33470653

    IIRC, Twitter was operating at a loss, prior to the closing of Elon's purchase. See Q2 2022 Results here, net loss was $270 million - https://s22.q4cdn.com/826641620/files/doc_fina…

  11. comment
    Comment #33462420

    The coalition supporting SLS in Congress is much broader than just Senator Shelby, though he's definitely one of the biggest proponents - an old school Senator purely motivated bri…

  12. comment
    Comment #33462382

    IIRC - Shuttle autoland capability was vetoed by the Astronaut Office. There was some capability within the guidance software for it, but it was never demonstrated (some early Shut…

  13. comment
    Comment #32957805

    In my experience, the hesitancy to contribute/ pay open source projects comes more from the contractors versus the government.

  14. comment
    Comment #31881184

    Except there are already some House Republicans publicly discussing a nationwide ban on abortion - guaranteed it's going to be on the agenda if Republicans take back Congress (whic…

  15. comment
    Comment #30309427

    The Astronaut Office pushed strongly against an autoland capability for Shuttle.

  16. comment
    Comment #29101977

    I work in defense. I constantly tell folks that we're doomed once/if tech companies start competing in traditional defense/ aerospace contracts. The only barrier for that I see is …

  17. comment
    Comment #29100366

    Good. To be honest, if the tech companies (i.e. MSFT, Google, Amazon, etc.) ever decided to fully compete with defense contractors, like Boeing, LM, Northrup Grumman, etc., they co…

  18. comment
    Comment #19844091

    If it's anything like the Linux files inside File Explorer supported they added previously ( https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/whats-new-for-wsl... ), it'll be using some …

  19. comment
    Comment #19349984

    Dragon 2/ Crew Dragon originally was going to support propulsive landing, but nixed due to future architectural plans (making some of Dragon a bit of engineering dead-end versus St…

  20. comment
    Comment #18715661

    I have to say the author's attitude does not come off particularly well in this post, at least in my opinion. Just seems rude.

  21. comment
    Comment #18622539

    UWP includes Win32 apps, as well (if they play well with appx/ MSIX).

  22. comment
    Comment #18603831

    UWP is WinRT (Windows Runtime). And, you're right, it's COM, but The Good Parts™.

  23. comment
    Comment #18601447

    This is where .NET Core gets confusing. They're just able to run on the .NET Core runtime (versus the "full" .NET Framework). WPF uses DirectX heavily, so it's not like Microsoft j…

  24. comment
    Comment #18601415

    This is true. A quick example would ZIP Folders in Windows - it uses third-party code Microsoft licensed (who knows if the company is still around today since it dates back to the …

  25. comment
    Comment #18353445

    Might have some issues with ITAR with the first two, since OP is not an American citizen.