Viewing profile — allover
allover
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Dec 17, 2016, 1:09 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 864
- Public activity
- 474 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About allover
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #24362785
Presumably because the icon will be shown on high-dpi displays (retina screens etc), no?
-
comment
Comment #24172481
The problem is that such a browser wouldn't be any use to users in the short-term, because most of the web simply wouldn't "work" in it. So, I don't think it's developers that are …
-
comment
Comment #24136832
The counter argument would be that git is the poster-child of poor UX, which could be blamed on the fact that it exposes too much of its internal data structure and general inner-w…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #23947872
Parent is simply referring to the front-end skill of building an app with rich client-side state that isn't persisted to a backend DB.
-
comment
Comment #23875262
> large React applications tend to be just as heavyweight and hard to understand as Angular ones once you need a router, state manager, and 20 or 30 other "compact" libraries to do…
-
comment
Comment #23874873
Exactly - the innerHTML approach doesn't work for component composition and it completely fails for things like forms, where you will blow away form input focus/cursor state etc. T…
-
comment
Comment #23874783
> Or am i missing the point completely Sort of. These are ways you can built web components today with modern conveniences that some of these _libraries_ (not frameworks), might le…
-
comment
Comment #23252480
So it's not secure by default.
-
comment
Comment #23250064
I think you're being downvoted because other things being insecure is not relevant or an excuse.
-
comment
Comment #23249166
When you say "this is squarely a Debian issue", do you mean "in his opinion", or that you agree?
-
comment
Comment #23249123
So the app is vulnerable by default, yet the author is claiming this doesn't matter, because he instructs how to run it in a safe way? Correct, or am I oversimplifying/missing some…
-
comment
Comment #23101214
Very interesting optimisations, but I would not say the author "missed" these points, since this wasn't the point of their post.
-
comment
Comment #23101080
There absolutely is a cookie law. The UK legislation is "PECR" [1] which sits alongside the GDPR. > PECR are the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations. Their full title…
-
comment
Comment #23101024
Parent edited their comment from "can" to "can't", and I got downvoted, yikes.
-
comment
Comment #23093797
This is not correct, in the UK at least. Similar technologies like LocalStorage fall under cookie law. [1] [1] https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-pecr/cookies-a...
- comment
-
comment
Comment #22970429
If you're genuinely confused, I assume they missed out the word "selling" before "software".
-
comment
Comment #22754911
To be fair it does perform better than everything else, which is why people are so forgiving of it, but it still doesn't excuse their ineptitude on privacy and security.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #22754844
tl;dr of your comment is "I don't care about privacy, if the product works". But privacy is not about those privileged enough to where privacy doesn't matter. I don't care that you…
-
comment
Comment #22726643
Of course, but that suggests Apple isn't smart enough to know this and hasn't sufficiently anonymised the data, which is pure speculation?
-
comment
Comment #22714549
You're assuming malice over incompetence. Having heard mainly "nothing but guff" justifications for microservices in non-enormous orgs, I think (as usual, and some law I forget dic…
-
comment
Comment #22714477
> it should be opt-in, not opt-out Sure, it would be nice if no company ever shared data with any other company, but that does not track in this case. People signing up for an Appl…
-
comment
Comment #22711374
Opt-out of sending anonymised data, to the company providing the credit service.