Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — alexlikeits1999

alexlikeits1999

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jan 04, 2015, 1:24 AM UTC
HN karma
91
Public activity
15 items

About alexlikeits1999

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43607571

    I've gone through the link you posted and the o1 system card and can't see any reference to IMO. Are you sure they were referring to IMO or were they referring to AIME?

  2. comment
    Comment #25195728

    Sorry, car accidents won't cut it. Here are the life tables: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_03.pdf which link to this spreadsheet: https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_…

  3. comment
    Comment #21739747

    The best thing I've read about cross-country longevity, and I don't even care about its main point (ie USA healthcare spending). If you have a Patreon account or something similar …

  4. comment
    Comment #20072941

    This is from DeepMind. They rarely release source code at the time that the paper is submitted/published. They often release source code later on. While not ideal it seems like a b…

  5. comment
    Comment #18679591

    You don't have to provide them with your real name. Also, I work in genomics and am a 23andme customer/product (although I was the latter before I the former became true).

  6. comment
    Comment #18052153

    Thank you very much for that first link. It seems to be severely under-publicised considering the huge amount of exposure that the topic gets. Do you happen to know if rs1229984 is…

  7. comment
    Comment #17825135

    That's the list and figure for women. For men you have to see the next graph which is slightly different. Then the next two graphs show you that outside of the US the opiod epidemi…

  8. comment
    Comment #16102500

    While I agree with the general sentiment that CR is probably not very useful for humans, I think you are either misinformed or exaggerating for the sake of generating a response. A…

  9. comment
    Comment #15889309

    That first paragraph is pretty deceptive. They are not comparing against the results from GATK 1.0.

  10. comment
    Comment #14084503

    Just a nitpick, but the original didn't do better than human scores. It does better than their human panel, who seem to suck at space invaders and a whole bunch of other games. In …

  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #11287031

    Changing the frameskip is not needed any more since the implementation does max of last two frames before processing (same as what DeepMind does) EDIT: talking about Sprague's impl…

  13. comment
    Comment #11272368

    Regarding the expectation that it would have gone 5-0 or 4-1 to either one, you'd have to have equally predicted a similarly one-sided result in the Deep Blue v Kasparov match. Rat…

  14. comment
    Comment #10609805

    Another explanation is that people with bad livers can't handle coffee (slow to break it down), so this is just selection-bias.

  15. comment
    Comment #8832785

    Nathan Sprague has a mostly-working implementation at https://github.com/spragunr/deep_q_rl