Viewing profile — alexcosan
alexcosan
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 07, 2022, 4:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 15
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About alexcosan
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40113874
On the same note, the implementation of Stuff in Ruby is not very ruby-like. It could have just used `.each` on the `@a_list` (in that case, you just delegate the implementation to…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #34101144
This is deviating too much from the original topic, but: 1) Your initial comment just took a bash at the author about being joyful regarding some topic - "what's there to be joyful…
-
comment
Comment #34093708
It's not really up to you to decide what brings joy to the author. You can write a similar essay, who said you couldn't? What point are you trying to make? If it's something you fe…
-
comment
Comment #34069174
I would be curious to understand what frameworks people tend to use on top of nodejs (or even react). I have not found a standard devise-like way of implementing authentication in …
-
comment
Comment #33934740
I'm very confident the whole comment by OP is of sarcastic nature
-
comment
Comment #33934507
My take is that there's many unnecessary complexities (at least in many cases), where using an old, battle tested, "boring" technology suffice. The graph just seems to be an illust…
-
comment
Comment #33277373
For some reason, you keep presenting arguments as if I have taken any sides. I don't agree with arguments even if I would agree with the end result. I disagree that comparing Copil…
-
comment
Comment #33273901
I did not argue against that, I was talking about the argument. I don't think it's a straight comparison or even one that holds water. I don't think the parent comment mentioned li…
-
comment
Comment #33273527
I believe that's a bit of a strawman comparison. Not taking any sides, but in your example, the resulting system would be the same - artwork aside - you would end up with the same …
-
comment
Comment #32586886
I think, in theory, it would work regardless of the starting address. As long as you don't try to access the invalid address (which you wouldn't assuming that it's starting in the …
-
comment
Comment #32494465
Nice work on getting this out. I think it looks pretty neat and simple to use. I’ve had some issues when using it though: - on mobile, moving the cursor in a calculation doesn’t wo…
-
comment
Comment #31867702
This could work - similar to what happens in some bluetooth pairing flows. But you could still send a text message with a phishing link under the same Sender ID and fool someone in…
-
comment
Comment #30372118
I see this more as "do not assume until there's evidence of malice". Not that you should not look for evidence - basically, innocent until proven guilty. There's a tendency to judg…